Mustafa Kemal Atatürk and his Macedonian ancestry

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Agamoi Thytai
    replied
    Originally posted by Daskalot View Post
    So we have no takers on this one..... how sad....
    I will repost my question just in case someone changes his or hers mind.
    Please answer the highlighted part to the best of your ability. I am eagerly awaiting your answer.
    I will give you an example of how I envision this list of yours;
    500 BC - person possessing Greek culture and/or being Greek. Source to this material.
    105 AD - person possessing Greek culture and/or being Greek. Source to this material.
    732 AD - person possessing Greek culture and/or being Greek. Source to this material.
    1100 AD - person possessing Greek culture and/or being Greek. Source to this material.
    1831 AD - person possessing Greek culture and/or being Greek. Source to this material.
    Note that they shall come from the geographical area that formed the Greek state in 1832.
    I hope this helps you undertand what I am requesting of you.
    Sorry for my late response but this question of yours was not brought to my attention so far.Well i shall try my best,although i have the sense i've already answered partly (i mean persons that self-identified as Greeks from 1237 AD till the late 1700s,check again my post nr.219 and all the links i've included there: http://www.macedoniantruth.org/forum...&postcount=219 ) to this.Now since you have mentioned these specific dates i hope you will don't mind if there is a slight difference in my dates.

    1)490 BC.After the battle of Marathon,the Athenians erected a monument for their dead with the inscription:

    Fighting in the forefront of the Hellenes, the Athenians at Marathon
    destroyed the might of the gold-bearing Medes. 490 BC
    http://neverfeltbetter.wordpress.com...orld-marathon/ So Ahenians self-identified as Greeks.

    2)479 BC Some hours before the battle of Platea,Alexander I stated to the Athenian generals:

    "I am myself a Greek by descent,and I would not willingly see Greece exchange freedom for slavery".

    Alexander I self-identified as Greek.

    3)Early 3th BC century.The ancient Macedonian comic poet Poseidippus of Cassandreia (316-250 BC)

    He criticized the Athenians because they said that only their own dialect was pure Greek and Athens was the center of Greece:

    “You speak Attic whenever you open your mouth, and the rest of us Greeks speak Greek.Why make such fuss over syllables and sounds,turning your wit into unpleasantness?”
    Did the Greeks find it amusing, irritating or threatening when they heard another Greek speaking in a different dialect? Were they rude or tolerant when they heard Persians or Scythians speaking fractured Greek? And what about low-class varieties of the Greek spoken in the docks of Piraeus? Our evidence for the sociolinguistic culture of the ancient world is sadly limited, and modern linguistic assumptions and prejudices are often unconsciously projected onto old and alien cultures. This book exploits the evidence of ancient Greek comedy in an attempt to answer some of the questions about language attitude which are important for understanding ancient ideas about language and ethnicity. Conclusions are based on a comparative study of the language of dialect speaking characters and other foreigners in Old Comedy, and on an examination of linguistic attitudes in other genres of Greek literature.


    Poseidippus from Cassandreia would not have writen the above if he didn't self-identify as Greek.

    4)Late 3rd-Early 2nd BC century.Philip V of Macedonia,around 200BC,addressing to the Aetolians:

    "For on many occasions when I and the other Greeks sent embassies to you begging you to remove from your statutes the law empowering you to get booty from booty".

    (Note that Philip V was not descending form the Argead dynasty,who claimed argive origin)



    5)2nd BC century,during the time of Ptolemy Philometor,(c. 186-145 BC).Ptolemy son of Glaucias,a Macedonian in Alexandria,complains to King Ptolemy that certain Egyptians harassed him because he is Greek:
    The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record was undertaken with the design of supplying a want, which had long been felt, of a periodical devoted to Biblical literature, and established on so wide a basis as to embrace the contributions of writers of different denominations and of different countries. The aim of these publications are to furnish the students and readers of Biblical literature with an organ for the discussion of all subjects in which they are interested. Sample contents: Erasmus, the Greek Text of the Apocalypse and the Vaudois Version; Monasticism in the West, Benedict of Nursia; Ten Tribes; Incidents in the Life of Christ; Philosophical Questions in the Ancient Syrian Church; Peter's Denial of Christ; and much more.


    6) 163 AD.The people of Ephesus decided to make sacred the month that was called by them Artemision, because it was dedicated to the Godess Artemis.There was issued a decree about that,which mentions the following :
    "But this is the greatest testimony of the reverence for her that there is a month named after her,Artemision in our city,Artemisios among the Macedonians and the rest of the Greek tribes and their cities".
    This 1999 book is about the religious life of the Greeks from the eighth century BC to the fifth century AD, looked at in the context of a variety of different cities and periods. Simon Price does not describe some abstract and self-contained system of religion or myths but examines local practices and ideas in the light of general Greek ideas, relating them for example, to gender roles and to cultural and political life (including Attic tragedy and the trial of Socrates). He also lays emphasis on the reactions to Greek religions of ancient thinkers - Greek, Roman, Jewish and Christian. The evidence drawn on is of all kinds: literary texts, which are translated throughout; inscriptions, including an appendix of newly translated Greek inscriptions; and archaeology, which is highlighted in the numerous illustrations.

    So there were Greek tribes (or Greek nations,because the text in Greek reads "Hellenica ethne") and Macedonians were included among them.In case you claim the term Hellene was used in 2nd AD century with cultural instead of ethnic meaning,note that in the same inscription there is mentioned that Artemis is honoured "by Greeks and barbarians"

    7)The ancient Macedonian author Polyaenus (2 AD cent.)



    In the proem of his "Stratagems" he addressed to the Roman coemperors Marcus Aurelius Antoninus and Lucius Verus who were engaged in the Parthian War (163 AD) :

    “οὐκ ἀμελῶ συγγράφειν,ὅσα γένοιτ' ἀν ὠφέλιμα ὑμῖν τε αὐτοῖς καί τῇ Ῥωμαίων ἀρχῇ καί τοῖς Ἕλλησιν,ἤν τε πολεμῶμεν ἤν τε τήν εἰρήνην ἄγωμεν”

    I don't omit to write,whatever could become helpful to both you personally and Roman rule in general on one hand and the GREEKS on the other,either WE ARE at war or regulating peace treaties


    Polyaenus here certainly points out his ethnicity is Greek.Now you need to know some ancient Greek,otherwise you have to trust the reliability of my translation.However,to make you understand my point,the key words are "πολεμῶμεν and "ἄγωμεν",two verbs in first plural person:




    Since he mentions in the same sentence both Romans and Greeks alike as those who will be benefited from his work and then he uses the first plural person of the verbs that mean "to be at war" and "to conduct" (negotiations for peace treaty),he clearly identifies with one of the two ethnicities,obviously not with the Romans.

    8) 801-812 AD,during the time of the Byzantine emperor Nicephorus I.Emperor Constantine Porphyrogennitus (903-952 AD) wrote that when the Slavs of Peloponnesus rebelled against the Byzantine state, in the reign of Nicephorus I (802-811) nearly two generations after the plague they plundered the houses of their Greek (των Γραικών) neighbors


    So this Byzantine emperor aknowledged there were Greeks in 800 AD.

    9)Anna Comnena (1083-1153) mentions the existence of Hellenes (with the ethnic meaning of the term) in “the land of the Romans”:

    "But one of the Latins hit his helmet with his cross-bow. This cross-bow is a bow of the barbarians quite unknown to the Greeks”.


    ήν δε τοιούτος ο ανήρ οίος,ως εν βραχεί μεν ειπείν,ουδείς κατ’ εκείνον ώφθη εν τη των Ρωμαίων γη,ούτε βάρβαρος ούτε Έλλην
    “The appearance of that man was such,briefly speaking,that nobody resembled him in the land of the Romans,neither Greek nor barbarian"


    In regards to the period from 1237 till late 1700s i've already showed you evidence in my older post,so i shall continue from this point.

    10)1790.Greek delegates meet in St Petersburg the Russian empress Catharine,asking for help to throw of the Ottoman yoke.They also ask from her to appoint her grandson Prince Contantine as “King of the Greeks” (Bσιλεύς Ελλήνων).


    11)1801.The Austrian historian and statisticist Martin von Schwartner (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_von_Schwartner)
    wrote a statistic of Hungary:

    Among the various people who dwelt in Hungary at that time he mentioned Greeks from Macedonia:

    Here it is in German,"Die Macedonier oder Neugriechen"


    12) 1805.Athanasios Christopoulos (1172-1847) from Kastoria.


    He Wrote in 1805 a “Grammar of the Aeolo-Doric,i.e. the currently spoken language of the Hellenes” ( Γραμματική της αιολοδωρικής,ήτοι της ομιλουμένης των Ελλήνων γλώσσας).There was a common tendency among some Greek scholars of that time to consider colloquial Greek as descendand of ancient Aeolic or Doric,as opposed to the “official” language,Koine and katharevousa that derive from Attic.

    Leave a comment:


  • TrueMacedonian
    replied
    Originally posted by Agamoi Thytai View Post
    Greece as a state may have not existed before 1832 as you said but Greek people and Greek culture existed continuously from ancient till modern time.Greek culture influenced to a great degree the culture of all the neighbouring people (and was in turn influenced by them,that's normal) so that you use today a Greek nickname,daskale.And most Greeks may have called themselves Romioi and their language romeika in modern time,however there existed always an intellectual class that was aware of their real origin and so they used the terms Hellenes and Hellenic for their language long before 1832.
    lol you're such a clown thessa. Culture?

    Funny coming from one of their own especially about the Albanian kilt part and their women covering their bodies like muslim women:biggrin:


    lolololololol pull your head out your

    Leave a comment:


  • Daskalot
    replied
    So we have no takers on this one..... how sad....
    I will repost my question just in case someone changes his or hers mind.

    Originally posted by Daskalot View Post
    Originally posted by Agamoi Thytai View Post
    I think I've answered your questions.What exactly did I fail to answer from these:

    Can you please give us a rundown on the continual presence of as you call it 'Greek people/culture' from the ancient city states to the creation of the modern Greek state in 1832 in that geographical area which the state encompassed in 1832. Please break it down into years. Also would you be so kind to enlighten us to where this intellectual class whom as you say went by the name Hellenes long before the creation of the modern Greek state lived, their geographical locations please.

    I gave you a list of dates and names of people who selfidentified as Hellenes some centuries before 1832.Now if you mean there is a problem cause the list begins from 12th century,well then I suppose every other ethnicity in the world would face a similar problem,trying to prove its existence in medieval time through 10th or 9th century written sources where people declare themselves French,Spanish,Italians,Germans,Bulgarians,Sloveni ans e.t.c.
    You have not answered my question. I will post it here again to help you remember it:
    Originally posted by Agamoi Thytai View Post
    Greece as a state may have not existed before 1832 as you said but Greek people and Greek culture existed continuously from ancient till modern time.Greek culture influenced to a great degree the culture of all the neighbouring people (and was in turn influenced by them,that's normal) so that you use today a Greek nickname,daskale.And most Greeks may have called themselves Romioi and their language romeika in modern time,however there existed always an intellectual class that was aware of their real origin and so they used the terms Hellenes and Hellenic for their language long before 1832.
    Can you please give us a rundown on the continual presence of as you call it 'Greek people/culture' from the ancient city states to the creation of the modern Greek state in 1832 in that geographical area which the state encompassed in 1832. Please break it down into years. Also would you be so kind to enlighten us to where this intellectual class whom as you say went by the name Hellenes long before the creation of the modern Greek state lived, their geographical locations please.
    Please answer the highlighted part to the best of your ability. I am eagerly awaiting your answer.
    I will give you an example of how I envision this list of yours;
    500 BC - person possessing Greek culture and/or being Greek. Source to this material.
    105 AD - person possessing Greek culture and/or being Greek. Source to this material.
    732 AD - person possessing Greek culture and/or being Greek. Source to this material.
    1100 AD - person possessing Greek culture and/or being Greek. Source to this material.
    1831 AD - person possessing Greek culture and/or being Greek. Source to this material.
    Note that they shall come from the geographical area that formed the Greek state in 1832.
    I hope this helps you undertand what I am requesting of you.

    Leave a comment:


  • George S.
    replied
    If the west didn't create the greek state then there would be nothing .Prior to 1831 greece did not exist as a country but as a number of states.The hellene thing was bought up after the creation of the greek state.

    Leave a comment:


  • Soldier of Macedon
    replied
    Originally posted by Agamoi Thytai
    Daskale,here is a short list of intellectuals and other distinguished people who called themselves Hellenes or Graikoi long before 1832
    See pages 94-97 from that book:
    http://books.google.com/books?id=Vce6EJAcHA4C&pg=PA97
    Short indeed, here is what your link says:
    For one thing, Hellenic ideas did not unseat or even threaten the dominant ideology, which stated that the Byzantine polity was the successor to the Roman empire. Second, and more importantly, the inclination toward Hellenism was characteristic of the works of a few literati and thus was a matter of personal conviction rather than being a generally accepted political ideology of the Nicaean state.
    So a couple of people felt a personal conviction to identify as 'Hellenes' in the middle ages because the Latin west was encroaching. It was not a common, nor even an accepted ideology. Generally speaking, the word 'Hellene' meant a 'pagan' or worshipper of the ancient gods, thus the true meaning in the Bible.

    5)Emperor Michael Palaeologos,13th century.
    http://books.google.com/books?id=IyHsNpkYkdgC&pg=PA116
    Can you refer me to an example where Michael Palaeologos calls himself emperor of the Greeks?
    6)The philosopher George Gemistos or Plethon in 15th century:
    http://books.google.com/books?id=jEa8Iv5wJ0IC&pg=PA77
    Plethon? Another pebble in the sand. His definition of 'Hellenism' is generally confined to the boundaries of the Peloponnese, the only place where (according to him) the 'real Hellenes' live. Do you agree with his interpretation?
    7)Nicholas Cabasilas,14th century theologian,pages 20 and 21 of that book:

    8)Athanasios Lepenthrenos,14th century Cypriot scholar,page 21.
    9)Demetrios Kydones,14th century Cretan theologian,page 21.
    10)John Argyropoulos,15th century scholar,pages 21 and 22.
    11)George Gennadius Scholarius,the first Patriarch after the Ottoman conquest,page 22.Even though he rejected the use of the term Hellenes because of its connotations with paganism he nevertheless recognized that he was "a Greek by birth".
    12)Lukas Spandonis,15th century Thessalonian nobleman:

    13)Andronikos Kallistos,15th century Thessalonian scholar:
    http://books.google.com/books?id=lnSmnmL984YC&pg=PA97
    Cabasilas was an ardent opponent of unity between the eastern and western churches, so again, this is another rare example of a Roman identifying as a 'Hellene', which was a perception that stemmed from hatred towards the Latin west. It was never a grass roots movement among the people. The rest of them are anachronistic examples which were nowhere near the norm of the day, the only thing it evidences is that there were a very small handful of 'intellectuals' that harked back to the 'glory' days of antiquity. Can you show me an example where reference is made to commoners identifying as 'Hellenes'?
    14)Georgios Kontaris,17th century scholar from Kozani:
    This reference provides more than 800 alphabetically arranged entries on important authors, texts, genres, themes, and topics in Greek literature from the Byzantine period to the present. Brief, readable entries provide basic information on the history and development of modern Greek literature and language. Each entry is thoroughly cross-referenced, and most conclude with a bibliography of further information resources.Greece has an old and influential literary tradition. The lion's share of attention has been given to classical Greek literature, yet the nation continues to produce significant imaginative works. This reference provides more than 800 alphabetically arranged entries on important authors, texts, genres, themes, and topics in Greek literature from the Byzantine period to the present.Brief, readable entries provide basic information on the history and development of modern Greek literature and language. Each entry is thoroughly cross-referenced, and most conclude with a bibliography of further information resources. The encyclopedia also offers a useful chronology of modern Greek literature, a select bibliography of important general works, and a detailed subject index.

    http://books.google.com/books?id=Q-lr20SuvfIC&pg=PA235
    He wrote a history of classical Athens. What else did I miss?
    15)George Zaviras from Siatista,author of the books "Hellenic theater or Nea Hellas consisting the history of all learned Greeks since the fall of the nation" in the last years of 18th century,pages 79 and 80 from that book:
    http://books.google.com/books?id=QtRDAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA79
    Can you refer me to a translation of the book?
    16)Daniil Filippidis and Grigorios Konstantas,authors of 'Modern Geography" in 1791:
    http://books.google.com/books?id=JIS...laters&f=false
    Here is a passage from your link regarding Filippidis and co.:
    Hellenes began to call themselves Romaioi and to appropriate the name of their tyrants, especially since they thought, out of ignorance, that "Hellenes" was a name that belonged to the idolaters.
    It DID belong to the idolaters! Filippidis seems like a confused chap, as the term 'Hellene' is diametrically opposed to that of Romaioi (which signified 'Christian'). Where are all of the Helleno-Christians throughout history??
    17)Dimitrios Katartzis,18th century scholar.Although he rejected the use of the term Hellenes because of religious reasons he pointed out that the people who called themselves Romioi have a strong connection to ancient Greeks:
    http://books.google.com/books?id=JISd5jZu1mwC&pg=PA50
    Does that also include all of the Macedonians, Albanians, Vlachs, Gypsies and others that called themselves Romaioi?
    18)Theodosius Zygomalas and Symeon Cabasilas,16th century scholars called Greek the language that was spoken by common people,not romeika:
    http://books.google.com/books?id=aHrVAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA557
    Yep. But look what else is written about the 'Greeks' in your link:
    The country called Turkey in Europe has received such a perpetual succession of invaders and settlers, that it would be impossible to fix upon those in whom the right of possession might be justly vested. A great proportion of those who are comprehended under the term Romaioi, or Christians of the Greek Church, and amongst whom would be found the chief supporters of an insurrection, are certainly of a mixed origin, sprung from Scythian colonists. Such are the Albanians, the Maniotes, the Macedonian, Bulgarian, and Wallachian Greeks. And yet the whole nation, including, I presume, these Christians, has been computed only at two millions and a half, of all ages and sexes, and consequently there is no pan of Continental Greece to which a body of Turks might not be instantly brought, sufficient to quell any revolt: the Mahometans of Albania are alone equal to the task, and on a rising of the Giauoitrs, the Infidels, would leave all private dissension, to accomplish such a work. The Greeks taken collectively', cannot, in fact, be so properly called an individual people, as a religious sect dissent-* jug from the established church of the Ottoman Empire.
    I agree.

    From the 13th - 18th centuries, .001% of intellectuals and the upper class made reference to the terms 'Hellene' and 'Greek'. Unless of course the above list is all of the intellectuals and the upper class citizens during that time? Can you cite some examples of ideological continuity between these so-called 'Hellenes' from the middle ages and the rebels that fought in the Morea against the Ottomans? Did Kolokotronis, Kondouriotes and the other Albanians ever refer to Plethon and others as the people from whom they drew their 'Hellenic' inspiration?

    The new 'kingdom of Hellenes' needed to be created by England, France, Germany and Russia before 'Hellenes' could exist. Macedonians, on the other hand, advocated for their nation before their state was re-established in modern times. Big difference. One wonders who and what the 'Hellenes' would be if there was no 'Hellas' given to you by the West.

    Leave a comment:


  • Orfej
    replied
    Originally posted by Agamoi Thytai View Post
    I gave you a list of dates and names of people who selfidentified as Hellenes some centuries before 1832.Now if you mean there is a problem cause the list begins from 12th century,well then I suppose every other ethnicity in the world would face a similar problem,trying to prove its existence in medieval time through 10th or 9th century written sources where people declare themselves French,Spanish,Italians,Germans,Bulgarians,Sloveni ans e.t.c.
    I think that's exactly what he meant. Even if we agree that there were individuals identifying as `ethnic Hellenes` after the 12th century you still have two problems:

    1. You can't explain the thirteen centuries old gap in which there was not a single person identifying as a `ethnic Helen`. That alone busts your continuity theory. The fact that other ethnicities have similar problems doesn't cut it. It just proves how shallow and weak the continuity theory in fact is. It usually is parroted blindlessly by nationalists who probably haven't heard the word social anthropology in their lives. Have you?

    2. Even thought there were some individuals who had a `Hellenic identity`( the meaning that they applied to the word `Hellen` is highly controversial and debated by some modern authors), the fact remains, most of the population self-identified as `Romaioi`, called their language `Romeika` and their state `the Roman Empire` - in short they possessed a Roman identity.

    Leave a comment:


  • Daskalot
    replied
    Originally posted by Agamoi Thytai View Post
    I think I've answered your questions.What exactly did I fail to answer from these:

    Can you please give us a rundown on the continual presence of as you call it 'Greek people/culture' from the ancient city states to the creation of the modern Greek state in 1832 in that geographical area which the state encompassed in 1832. Please break it down into years. Also would you be so kind to enlighten us to where this intellectual class whom as you say went by the name Hellenes long before the creation of the modern Greek state lived, their geographical locations please.

    I gave you a list of dates and names of people who selfidentified as Hellenes some centuries before 1832.Now if you mean there is a problem cause the list begins from 12th century,well then I suppose every other ethnicity in the world would face a similar problem,trying to prove its existence in medieval time through 10th or 9th century written sources where people declare themselves French,Spanish,Italians,Germans,Bulgarians,Sloveni ans e.t.c.
    You have not answered my question. I will post it here again to help you remember it:
    Originally posted by Agamoi Thytai View Post
    Greece as a state may have not existed before 1832 as you said but Greek people and Greek culture existed continuously from ancient till modern time.Greek culture influenced to a great degree the culture of all the neighbouring people (and was in turn influenced by them,that's normal) so that you use today a Greek nickname,daskale.And most Greeks may have called themselves Romioi and their language romeika in modern time,however there existed always an intellectual class that was aware of their real origin and so they used the terms Hellenes and Hellenic for their language long before 1832.
    Can you please give us a rundown on the continual presence of as you call it 'Greek people/culture' from the ancient city states to the creation of the modern Greek state in 1832 in that geographical area which the state encompassed in 1832. Please break it down into years. Also would you be so kind to enlighten us to where this intellectual class whom as you say went by the name Hellenes long before the creation of the modern Greek state lived, their geographical locations please.
    Please answer the highlighted part to the best of your ability. I am eagerly awaiting your answer.
    I will give you an example of how I envision this list of yours;
    500 BC - person possessing Greek culture and/or being Greek. Source to this material.
    105 AD - person possessing Greek culture and/or being Greek. Source to this material.
    732 AD - person possessing Greek culture and/or being Greek. Source to this material.
    1100 AD - person possessing Greek culture and/or being Greek. Source to this material.
    1831 AD - person possessing Greek culture and/or being Greek. Source to this material.
    Note that they shall come from the geographical area that formed the Greek state in 1832.
    I hope this helps you undertand what I am requesting of you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Soldier of Macedon
    replied
    Originally posted by Agamoi Thytai View Post
    Daskale,here is a short list of intellectuals and other distinguished people who called themselves Hellenes or Graikoi long before 1832
    See pages 94-97 from that book:
    This study is the first to systematically investigate Byzantine imperial ideology, court rhetoric and political thought after the Latin conquest of Constantinople in 1204 - in the Nicaean state (1204-61) and during the early period of the restored empire of the Palaiologoi. The book explores Byzantine political imagination at a time of crisis when the Empire ceased to be a first-rate power in the Mediterranean. It investigates the correspondence and fissures between official political rhetoric, on the one hand, and the political ideas of lay thinkers and churchmen, on the other. Through the analysis of a wide body of sources, a picture of Byzantine political thought emerges which differs significantly from the traditional one. The period saw refreshing developments in court rhetoric and political thought, some with interesting parallels in the medieval and Renaissance West, which arose in response to the new historical realities.

    1)The emperor of the Nicaen kingdom Theodoros Laskaris in 13th century,page 97.
    2)His father and predecessor John Vatatzes in 1237,page 96.
    3)The philosopher Theodore Metochites,1292 page 96.
    4)Patriarch Germanos II,pages 95-96.
    5)Emperor Michael Palaeologos,13th century.
    First published in 1989. This volume includes twelve of the main papers given at the Joint Meeting of the XXII Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies and of the Society for the Study of the Crusades and the Latin East held at the University of Nottingham from 26-29 March 1988. The Conference brought together a wide range of scholars and dealt with four main themes: relations between native Greeks and western settlers in the states founded by the Latin conquerors in former Byzantine lands in the wake of the Fourth Crusade; the Byzantine successor states at Nicaea, Epirus, and Thessalonica; the influence of the Italian maritime communes on the eastern Mediterranean in the later Middle Ages and the Renaissance; and the impact on Christian societies there of the Mongols and the Ottoman Turks, as well as the perception of Greeks and Latins by other groups in the eastern Mediterranean.

    6)The philosopher George Gemistos or Plethon in 15th century:
    This volume offers a comprehensive and authoritative account of the history of a complex and varied body of ideas over a period of more than one thousand years. A work of both synthesis and assessment, The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought presents the results of several decades of critical scholarship in the field, and reflects in its breadth of enquiry precisely that diversity of focus that characterized the medieval sense of the "political," preoccupied with universality at some levels, and with almost minute particularity at others. Among the vital questions explored by the distinguished team of contributors are the nature of authority, of justice, of property; the problem of legitimacy, of allegiance, of resistance to the powers that be; the character and functions of law, and the role of custom in maintaining a social structure.

    7)Nicholas Cabasilas,14th century theologian,pages 20 and 21 of that book:

    8)Athanasios Lepenthrenos,14th century Cypriot scholar,page 21.
    9)Demetrios Kydones,14th century Cretan theologian,page 21.
    10)John Argyropoulos,15th century scholar,pages 21 and 22.
    11)George Gennadius Scholarius,the first Patriarch after the Ottoman conquest,page 22.Even though he rejected the use of the term Hellenes because of its connotations with paganism he nevertheless recognized that he was "a Greek by birth".
    12)Lukas Spandonis,15th century Thessalonian nobleman:

    13)Andronikos Kallistos,15th century Thessalonian scholar:
    Constantine XI Palaiologos was the last Christian Emperor of Constantinople and Byzantium. In 1453, when Constantinople fell to the Ottoman Turks, he was last seen fighting at the city walls, but the actual circumstances of his death have remained surrounded in myth. In the years that followed it was said that he was not dead but sleeping - the 'immortal emperor' turned to marble, who would one day be awakened by an angel and drive the Turks out of his city and empire. Donald Nicol's book tells the gripping story of Constantine's life and death, and ends with an intriguing account of claims by reputed descendants of his family - some remarkably recent - to be heirs to the Byzantine throne.

    14)Georgios Kontaris,17th century scholar from Kozani:
    This reference provides more than 800 alphabetically arranged entries on important authors, texts, genres, themes, and topics in Greek literature from the Byzantine period to the present. Brief, readable entries provide basic information on the history and development of modern Greek literature and language. Each entry is thoroughly cross-referenced, and most conclude with a bibliography of further information resources.Greece has an old and influential literary tradition. The lion's share of attention has been given to classical Greek literature, yet the nation continues to produce significant imaginative works. This reference provides more than 800 alphabetically arranged entries on important authors, texts, genres, themes, and topics in Greek literature from the Byzantine period to the present.Brief, readable entries provide basic information on the history and development of modern Greek literature and language. Each entry is thoroughly cross-referenced, and most conclude with a bibliography of further information resources. The encyclopedia also offers a useful chronology of modern Greek literature, a select bibliography of important general works, and a detailed subject index.

    This reference provides more than 800 alphabetically arranged entries on important authors, texts, genres, themes, and topics in Greek literature from the Byzantine period to the present. Brief, readable entries provide basic information on the history and development of modern Greek literature and language. Each entry is thoroughly cross-referenced, and most conclude with a bibliography of further information resources.Greece has an old and influential literary tradition. The lion's share of attention has been given to classical Greek literature, yet the nation continues to produce significant imaginative works. This reference provides more than 800 alphabetically arranged entries on important authors, texts, genres, themes, and topics in Greek literature from the Byzantine period to the present.Brief, readable entries provide basic information on the history and development of modern Greek literature and language. Each entry is thoroughly cross-referenced, and most conclude with a bibliography of further information resources. The encyclopedia also offers a useful chronology of modern Greek literature, a select bibliography of important general works, and a detailed subject index.

    15)George Zaviras from Siatista,author of the books "Hellenic theater or Nea Hellas consisting the history of all learned Greeks since the fall of the nation" in the last years of 18th century,pages 79 and 80 from that book:

    16)Daniil Filippidis and Grigorios Konstantas,authors of 'Modern Geography" in 1791:
    This is a history of the great language controversy that has occupied and impassioned Greeks - sometimes with fatal results - for over two hundred years. It begins in the late eighteenth century when a group of Greek intellectuals sought to develop a new, Hellenic, national identity alongside the traditional identity supplied by Orthodox Christianity. The ensuing controversy focused on the language, fuelled on the one hand by a desire to develop a form of Greek that expressed the Greeks' relationship to the ancients, and on the other by the different groups' contrasting notions of what the national image so embodied should be. The purists wanted a written language close to the ancient. The vernacularists - later known as demoticists - sought to match written language to spoken, claiming the latter to be the product of the unbroken development of Greek since the time of Homer. Peter Mackridge explores the political, social, and linguistic causes and effects of the controversy in its many manifestations. Drawing on a wide range of evidence from literature, language, history, and anthropology, he traces its effects on spoken and written varieties of Greek and shows its impact on those in use today. He describes the efforts of linguistic elites and the state to achieve language standardization and independence from languages such as Turkish, Albanian, Vlach, and Slavonic. This is a timely book. The sense of national and linguistic identity that has been inculcated into generations of Greeks since the start of the War of Independence in 1821 has, in the last 25 years, received blows from which it may not recover. Immigration from Eastern Europe and elsewhere has introduced new populations whose religions, languages, and cultures are transforming Greece into a country quite different from what it has been and from what it once aspired to be.

    17)Dimitrios Katartzis,18th century scholar.Although he rejected the use of the term Hellenes because of religious reasons he pointed out that the people who called themselves Romioi have a strong connection to ancient Greeks:
    This is a history of the great language controversy that has occupied and impassioned Greeks - sometimes with fatal results - for over two hundred years. It begins in the late eighteenth century when a group of Greek intellectuals sought to develop a new, Hellenic, national identity alongside the traditional identity supplied by Orthodox Christianity. The ensuing controversy focused on the language, fuelled on the one hand by a desire to develop a form of Greek that expressed the Greeks' relationship to the ancients, and on the other by the different groups' contrasting notions of what the national image so embodied should be. The purists wanted a written language close to the ancient. The vernacularists - later known as demoticists - sought to match written language to spoken, claiming the latter to be the product of the unbroken development of Greek since the time of Homer. Peter Mackridge explores the political, social, and linguistic causes and effects of the controversy in its many manifestations. Drawing on a wide range of evidence from literature, language, history, and anthropology, he traces its effects on spoken and written varieties of Greek and shows its impact on those in use today. He describes the efforts of linguistic elites and the state to achieve language standardization and independence from languages such as Turkish, Albanian, Vlach, and Slavonic. This is a timely book. The sense of national and linguistic identity that has been inculcated into generations of Greeks since the start of the War of Independence in 1821 has, in the last 25 years, received blows from which it may not recover. Immigration from Eastern Europe and elsewhere has introduced new populations whose religions, languages, and cultures are transforming Greece into a country quite different from what it has been and from what it once aspired to be.

    18)Theodosius Zygomalas and Symeon Cabasilas,16th century scholars called Greek the language that was spoken by common people,not romeika:
    http://books.google.com/books?id=aHrVAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA557
    Nice list. I didn't want it to go missing among the rest of the posts so I quoted it here, will address later in the day.

    Leave a comment:


  • Onur
    replied
    Originally posted by Agamoi Thytai View Post
    I gave you a list of dates and names of people who selfidentified as Hellenes some centuries before 1832.Now if you mean there is a problem cause the list begins from 12th century,well then I suppose every other ethnicity in the world would face a similar problem,trying to prove its existence in medieval time through 10th or 9th century written sources where people declare themselves French,Spanish,Italians,Germans,Bulgarians,Sloveni ans e.t.c.
    Since this thread is about Kemal Ataturk, i better add this;

    First of all, you are wrong Agamoi. If certain ethnic population has some literate people among them then there is no reason why they shouldn't write something about themselves by indicating their ethnicity. Also, not only themselves, other people can mention about them too.


    Now look at this;

    Turkic runic script on top and exact same sentence with Latin script at the bottom of the picture.


    Modern Turkish version: Türk Oğuz beyleri, kavmi, işitin!; üstte gök(Tengri, Tanrı) bastırmazsa, altta yer delinmezse, Türk kavminin ilini, töresini kim bozabilir?

    English Translation: Türk Oghuz chieftains, clans, listen!; If the sky(Sky is also God) above doesn't crush, if the ground below doesn't get punctured, who can ever destroy the land and law of the Turk(ic) people?


    This sentence is just a small excerpt from Turkic Orkhon monuments written in 732 AD and even in this small sentence, not only they express their ethnicity, i can even sense nationalistic expression and thoughts, am i wrong?

    If so-called "barbarian" Turks did write this in 732 AD, then your "godsend Hellenes" with 4000 year old civilization would surely had written something about themselves, right?. Ofc if they wouldn't disappeared after antiquity and really existed in medieval era as you said!!!

    Do not come up with stupid examples like Slovenians or do you wanna compare your so-called "glorious Hellenic nation" with Slovenians????
    Last edited by Onur; 12-09-2010, 07:42 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Agamoi Thytai
    replied
    Originally posted by Daskalot View Post
    Agamoi you failed to answer my question posed to you, why? Please answer it.
    I think I've answered your questions.What exactly did I fail to answer from these:

    Can you please give us a rundown on the continual presence of as you call it 'Greek people/culture' from the ancient city states to the creation of the modern Greek state in 1832 in that geographical area which the state encompassed in 1832. Please break it down into years. Also would you be so kind to enlighten us to where this intellectual class whom as you say went by the name Hellenes long before the creation of the modern Greek state lived, their geographical locations please.

    I gave you a list of dates and names of people who selfidentified as Hellenes some centuries before 1832.Now if you mean there is a problem cause the list begins from 12th century,well then I suppose every other ethnicity in the world would face a similar problem,trying to prove its existence in medieval time through 10th or 9th century written sources where people declare themselves French,Spanish,Italians,Germans,Bulgarians,Sloveni ans e.t.c.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ottoman
    replied
    The eastern world and the rest dont smash this bullshit in our faces all the time, the western world always states that Turkey cannot enter EU because of many reasons, one of them is Cyprus.

    And no there was no resistance my friend, Northern Cyprus was occupied in 1 day, the Germans also occupied Holland in 3 days, many brave Dutch soldiers chose to fight but the Germans just destroyed them.

    If the Greeks really cared about their beloved "Cyprus" they would have battled us till the end.

    Cyprus is not important for us Turks, the only thing thats important are the Turks living on it.
    Last edited by Ottoman; 12-07-2010, 11:35 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Akzion
    replied
    Ottoman,
    Except for the Western World, the Eastern World doesn’t understand you either. Same goes with the Northern and Southern World. No country has recognized Northern Cyprus as a legal state.
    I see you are very brave. Can you explain or correct the numbers of troops and casualties (it’s in the Table, Up Right)?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ottoman
    replied
    Since day 1 Greeks began to claim Cyprus without sharing it with the Turks who were also on Cyprus for centuries.

    Nobody understands the situation because nobody cares, the western world has always been hypocrite, they think the Turks invaded Cyprus while we just came there to rescue the Turks that were in terror because of the Greeks.

    Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus is Turkish and will stay Turkish, we dont care about what the the world thinks, they got their own issues dont they?

    You Greeks need to understand that bashing innocent people is not an act of bravery, when the Turks landed on Cyprus there wasnt even any resistance from the Greek army, it was a complete joke, we teached you a lesson during that era.

    We see what Greek soldiers do when they arent on duty, joking about the Turks but when the Turkish army is approaching they run away.
    Last edited by Ottoman; 12-07-2010, 08:14 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Akzion
    replied
    Serdarot,
    I know what you are and I know most of you are in Australia, I was asking which area, town, village of Macedonia you come from.
    I don’t speak the language, can’t translate it (unless it’s in Cyrillic) and I couldn’t find out what you want me to explain. I’m Greek.
    I wasn’t ironic. Is there anyone here who is not from Macedonia? And if so, why is here?

    Daskalot,
    I will insist (just a last time). What kind of list would you like to see?

    GeorgeS,
    Greeks DID call themselves Hellenes before 1832. E.g., during the 1821 Revolution the terms Hellene, Hellas, Hellenic are more common than Roman, Romaic.
    Greece was indeed never a state by this name, before 1832.
    The terms Greece/Greek are more common in the West, instead of Hellas, Hellenic; while, they are not used in Greece, they are of Greek, not Latin origin.
    There’s an unbroken line/link between antiquity and Modern Greece. Greek may be the lengthiest continuous literature in the World (for about 28 centuries). While the language has evolved and varied depending on location and era, it’s the same (Greek) language.
    Arvanites (Albanians) and Vlachs are minorities, now fully assimilated among Greeks. The new wave of Albanian immigrants (from early 1990s) also seems to integrate well, but that is early to say.
    Greece is not a “fake country”; it is generally a recognized state. There are cases of “false-states”, e.g. Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, Kosovo that have no recognition, limited recognition or other recognition problems.
    I’m not sure which cultural elements come from Albania. I’m afraid, throughout 20th Century, all Northern Balkan influences paled comparing to the Western and Eastern ones. I know examples of popular Greek songs (attributed to Kaldaras or Kazantzidis), which are actually stolen from Indian copyrighted songs. Are you saying this is the rule? Globalization helps to reveal all forgeries and give reparation and credit to the real creators.
    Greek guards wear the fustanela, as homage to… 19th Century fashion, when Greece was liberated. Besides the most familiar one, they actually were many local variations of fustanelas and other traditional outfits (Cretan, Pontic, Macedonian etc).
    Last edited by Akzion; 12-07-2010, 04:52 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • George S.
    replied
    THey didn't call themselves hellenes only after 1832.Prior to 1832 greece was never a country,even the word greece didn't exist & is a latin word.THere is no link of modern greeks with ancient greeks.The language is different to the ancient greek.Also the so called greeks today are not greek but variatiions of other people albanians,vlachs etc.Greece is one big fake.Even their so called greek culture is borrowed albanian etc.The greek guards are dressed in albanian dress complete with hat & pampucina even trheir music is fake where regularly they steal other people's music.That is why the greeks go on & on lying about their past hoping that people bleive their propaganda.Well if agamoi is anything to go by they did good brainwashing him so he beleives the BS.Greece doesn't want the wotrld to know the real truth is that they are big fakes & liars,.
    Last edited by George S.; 12-05-2010, 04:42 PM. Reason: edit

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X