I think it would be wise of all Macedonians to refrain from referring to DPMNE as VMRO, because that they are certainly not.
I don't see why that bothers you so much. Grujo is certainly not the past, he and his gang a very much part of the picture, as much as Zajko kukurajko.
It's important for Macedonians to look at these mattes from the correct perspective, which I believe Dragan offers. SDSM's actions don't happen in a vacuum, we got to where we are largely because of DPMNE.
Also if you are going to really talk about how to solve the current problems as you call them, wouldn't it be wise to make sure that a rejection of SDSM doesn't lead right back to DPMNE getting back to power, or is that what you want?
He didn't march behind Zaev, he eve expressed disappointment when he found that the protest he attended turned into a SDSM controlled event. Even if he did March behind Zajko that would have been months before the Tirana platform existed.
Wouldn't this constitute getting defensive when someone brings up Grujo?
I don't see why that bothers you so much. Grujo is certainly not the past, he and his gang a very much part of the picture, as much as Zajko kukurajko.
It's important for Macedonians to look at these mattes from the correct perspective, which I believe Dragan offers. SDSM's actions don't happen in a vacuum, we got to where we are largely because of DPMNE.
Also if you are going to really talk about how to solve the current problems as you call them, wouldn't it be wise to make sure that a rejection of SDSM doesn't lead right back to DPMNE getting back to power, or is that what you want?
He didn't march behind Zaev, he eve expressed disappointment when he found that the protest he attended turned into a SDSM controlled event. Even if he did March behind Zajko that would have been months before the Tirana platform existed.
Originally posted by Bill77
View Post
your response mentions Gruo 3 times..... While the question re Zaev.... ZZ was mentioned once.
Comment