Originally posted by Bratot
View Post
Seeing as you've brought up Gligorov again, can you beat his promise? He told use that if we join the UN as FYROM, he'll revert back to 'Macedonia' within three months. Do you think that your suggested approach can get Macedonia into the EU/NATO as FYROM, and then remove the "temporary name" (that somehow is not a second name for international use) as you like to call it within a shorter timeframe, say perhaps two months?
Only you yourself can discredit your own "knowledge". I'm not posting on your behalf pushing the tired old argument that "now is not the time" to declare the Interim Accord 'null and void', that we need to wait for a "better time", and that Macedonia can supposedly join the EU/NATO as FYROM and then revert back to Macedonia (even though Greece has already prevented your preferred scenario materialising - and I'm still at a loss as to how you can claim that Greece did not 'veto', when the very nature of a unanimous decision requires ALL members to agree and if one does not then the decision is not passed in the affirmitive, therefore, a veto).
I think you should have a rethink about what it is you are proposing, because all you have done is move from a Gligorovist approach of we have to accept the Interim Accord as a reality (albiet temporarily - how long is that again?) to Gruevski's approach of a "constitutional" name alongside an international name and now back to Gligorov's "we'll get in and then fix things".
Most importantly, you have failed to tell us exactly WHY we "have" to wait for "better times" and SUBSTANTIATE your claims. What will be most interesting of all is if you can tell us HOW and WHY "things" will improve by CONTINUING the DECONSTRUCTION of our sovereignty?
Comment