Is the EU mentioned in the Book of Revelation?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bill77
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 4545

    #61
    More on Hegelian


    The Hegelian Dialectic Process is a system in which designed social conflict is used to create a desired social change.

    "Conflict Creates History", which is the short explanation of the method and purpose of the Heglian Dialectic Process. We get to appreciate the idea of using controlled conflict to create any desired 'history' for control of future generations.

    The Hegelian expression of this concept is thesis, antithesis, synthesis; where thesis is the manipulation to generate conflict, antithesis is the generated counter-force of conflict, and synthesis is the desired result; example:

    A politician is enticed to challenge for leadership (thesis); other leading figures are encouraged to resist the challenge (antithesis); the conflict brings the party into disrepute and the opposition is elected (synthesis). Of course, the division of the nation into two balanced political factions represents a more important example whose synthesis is control of the nation and of the reins to manipulate its people.

    In Macedonia's case,
    Ethnic Albanians, Minority enticed to challenge for what ever is fed to them = thesis

    Macedonians, ancestral owners of the land are drawn in to resist the challenge = antithesis

    The conflict brings the two sides into disrepute and a International backed Agreement is formed = synthesis.

    Change is achieved, by instilling false hopes, beliefs and fears so as to create unnatural and deformed social responses. Now what the Albanians and the likes of some international observers (IE Fouere) are doing is taken from a principle revealed by "George Orwell"
    "He who controls the past controls the future"

    As social attitudes are based on the experiences of the past it is therefore possible, by manipulation of belief about past events,(such as threats of another conflict) to influence future behaviour.

    Its all part of a big evil plan and our people must wake up to what is happening. Once we become aware of What we think we see is often an illusion intentionally presented, like the conjuror who would have you to believe he holds an orange in his right hand, when it is actually in his left hand, and realise we have been used as pawns in their game of Hegelian psychology by the hidden hand that rules. Only then we will unite and have any hope of beating this real enemy.
    http://www.macedoniantruth.org/forum/showthread.php?p=120873#post120873

    Comment

    • fyrOM
      Banned
      • Feb 2010
      • 2180

      #62
      This is part 2. The whole series is very interesting. Some bits I find questionable but others ie on the corporations is fascinating.

      YouTube - The Bloodline Of The Illuminati Who's Who And How part 2

      Comment

      • fyrOM
        Banned
        • Feb 2010
        • 2180

        #63
        Is this the trigger for greater conflict and possible ww3. Is this what is being prepared for.

        Israel's new top spy: Iran bomb possible in 2 years



        Tue Jan 25, 12:53 pm ET

        JERUSALEM (Reuters) – Sanctions have not held up Iran's nuclear program and it could produce bombs within two years, Israel's new top spy said on Tuesday, staking out a conservative timeline in the face of rosier U.S. assessments.

        The remarks by Major-General Aviv Kochavi, chief of military intelligence, also appeared aimed at asserting authority over the rival Israeli espionage agency Mossad, whose departing chief said this month Iran might not have nuclear arms before 2015.

        "The sanctions have had an impact on the Iranian economy, but they have had no impact on Iran's nuclear program," Kochavi said in his first briefing to an Israeli parliamentary defense panel, according to its spokesman.

        "The question is not when Iran will have a bomb but rather how much time until the Supreme Leader decides to escalate" uranium enrichment, Kochavi said, referring to a currently low-purity project that Iran says is for peaceful energy needs.

        "Based on their infrastructure and the technical know-how and uranium they have, within a year or two after he makes that decision, they will have nuclear weapons."

        Western officials tend to see potential Iranian military nuclear capability at mid-decade -- whether due to Tehran's policies, foreign sabotage or U.S.-led sanctions biting into key funds and supplies.

        "The most recent analysis is that the sanctions have been working. They have made it much more difficult for Iran to pursue its nuclear ambition," U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on January 10.

        A senior U.S. Treasury official, Stuart Levey, told Reuters on January 12 that sanctions had "significantly" discouraged investment in Iran's energy sector.

        MIFFED AT MOSSAD

        The American remarks followed a briefing to reporters to mark the retirement of Mossad director Meir Dagan, in which he said Iran "will not achieve a nuclear bomb before 2015, if that," because of its domestic ferment and foreign pressure.

        Though military intelligence has traditionally enjoyed precedence over the Mossad in setting Israel's strategic assessments, ex-general Dagan's words resonated widely given his acclaimed eight-year tenure and reputation for hawkishness.

        Political sources said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was upset at Dagan's public pronouncement, which some analysts said might have undermined Washington's drive to spearhead greater diplomatic pressure on Tehran.

        In what seemed to be an effort to make amends, the former spymaster has since said Iran could "bolt" forward with its uranium enrichment, cutting the timeline to a bomb.

        An Israeli official who attended Kochavi's briefing and who is familiar with intelligence affairs voiced belief that the general had Dagan in mind when he spoke.

        "This is a new head of military intelligence, so he's making very clear what the national estimate is, despite what we heard recently from the Mossad," the official said.

        A career infantryman, Kochavi assumed his current post last month. His predecessor, Amos Yadlin, has been reticent about the Dagan flap, not least as the Mossad chief had counseled against Israel attacking Iran preemptively. Yadlin was among the eight F-16 pilots who bombed Iraq's atomic reactor in 1981 -- a precedent Israelis cite in making veiled threats against Iran.

        According to Kochavi, the first Iranian bomb, if built, would be a crude device with limited means of deployment.

        A nuclear warhead that could be mounted on a long-range missile "could still take (Iran) several years to develop," Kochavi said, according to the parliamentary spokesman. (Writing by Dan Williams; Editing by Sonya Hepinstall)

        Comment

        Working...
        X