Macedonian Diaspora Candidates

[vojnik]

It is clear that miki is more loyal to Gruevski and Co. then the diaspora I'm Australia he was recently in queanbeyan and denied any acknowledgment of the church dispute which has been ongoing for years now. he has been elected to represent the australian diaspora yet he apparently isn't aware of situations in australia

[Soldier of Macedon]

I have merged the threads.

[Risto the Great]

I think this discussion is best made in the following existing thread:

http://macedoniantruth.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6132

But in this instance, it is clear Dodevski is a DPmNE lapdog. How any Diaspora representative would vote for amnesty for ethnic Albanian terrorists is beyond me.

[Komita]

They should abolish the vote for the diaspora, or we should boycott any elections in Macedonia. What should we vote for? The result of or voting is in "the albanianzation of Macedonia" thread.

[vojnik]

Miki Dodevski

I thought I would start up a thread on Australia's elected member of parliament in Macedonia, where we can discuss his scandals ever since he was elected by the few that voted. If there are similar scandals with the North American and the European member please post here too. It is important we discuss what the people that the tiny portion of the diaspora elected are doing.

[julie]

Why should diaspora representatives come from existing parties in Macedonia? Maybe Macedonians in the diaspora should team up and make their own political party.

Absolutely!
Trouble is Niko, many individuals and some organisations suffer from ego syndrome, and there ideological values are inconsistent, unsound and do not promote unity and cohesion

[Niko777]

Why should diaspora representatives come from existing parties in Macedonia? Maybe Macedonians in the diaspora should team up and make their own political party.

[DirtyCodingHabitz]

You read the title though. Why did your opinion change after reading further?

I didn't read it. I had like 20 tabs open and I just clicked Yes without reading anything.

[Risto the Great]

And I voted YES because I didn't even read what this topic was about. Anyway I can revote?

You read the title though. Why did your opinion change after reading further?

[George S.]

a yes vote for the rep to toe the line is dapitulation to the rulimg party.There is no such thing as a non aligned member they will allways be aligned to something.The present scenario is so undemocratic that you would think twice about voting.Your rep may get in with your vote eg you don't support amnesty for war criminals but unknown to you because they support a particular party they will change their tune.Yyou have no guarantee that the rep you voted will do what you want them to do.Thats the same non guarantee for voting along party lines they can allways chamge their vote.

[Soldier of Macedon]

No problem mate.

[DirtyCodingHabitz]

DCH, I have changed your vote to 'no'.

Thanks for that . It was stupid of me not reading before voting.

[Soldier of Macedon]

And I voted YES because I didn't even read what this topic was about. Anyway I can revote?

DCH, I have changed your vote to 'no'.

[DirtyCodingHabitz]

And I voted YES because I didn't even read what this topic was about. Anyway I can revote?

[George S.]

so what was the point of giving the diaspora the vote when the final outcome the representatives would side with the ruling party.So anything suggested by the diaspora no matter how important can be ditched & or ignored.Looks like they are pretending to give you the vote & take awy your vote.So it's all a waste of time.