Originally posted by damian
View Post
Fields of Wheat, Hills of Blood - Anastasia Karakasidou
Collapse
X
-
salonika is the greek version of solun.Regarding the language of macedonians it is simply not true to say the macedonians spoke greek.They had their own macedonian language.The ordinary macedonian did not need to speak greek at all because they had their own mother tounge macedonian.But the royal house was the only one that spoke greek for different reasons example trade & commerce.The macedonian royal house also had macedonian as well.So those apologetics don't tell me they spoke greek all the time that's bs if their mother tounge was macedonian.I read some where there are bits of thrace & even kosovo that are considered historically as macedonia.History tells us that people simply took these places when ifact they belonged to macedonia.There are lot's of examples of that"Ido not want an uprising of people that would leave me at the first failure, I want revolution with citizens able to bear all the temptations to a prolonged struggle, what, because of the fierce political conditions, will be our guide or cattle to the slaughterhouse"
GOTSE DELCEV
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by George S. View Postsalonika is the greek version of solun.
Salonika is a Jewish version.
I don't know what Soloun is, or when it first appeared. Various sources say it's Old Church Slavonic but recently I had read in THIS forum the original Slavonic text and it called it something else (Selanina or something like that). I can't locate this thread. Can anyone help? Also, can anyone find the first sources using Sol(o)un?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Daskalot View PostSo what did you highland Greek speakers call yourselves then? Can you prove your statement that the term was not used in your area 100 years ago? what about 150 years ago?
What religion did you have 100 years ago?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Daskalot View PostFunny thing happening here, you are labeling Macedonians with every label in the book to deny their right to their land and history. A very typical behavior by an oppressor. Why do you use the terms Exarchist, Makedonci and Bulgarophiles when you speak of Macedonians but only the term Greek in reference to Greeks?
Please explain this behavior of yours!Last edited by damian; 08-28-2012, 02:20 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by George S. View Postsalonika is the greek version of solun.Regarding the language of macedonians it is simply not true to say the macedonians spoke greek.They had their own macedonian language.The ordinary macedonian did not need to speak greek at all because they had their own mother tounge macedonian.But the royal house was the only one that spoke greek for different reasons example trade & commerce.The macedonian royal house also had macedonian as well.So those apologetics don't tell me they spoke greek all the time that's bs if their mother tounge was macedonian.I read some where there are bits of thrace & even kosovo that are considered historically as macedonia.History tells us that people simply took these places when ifact they belonged to macedonia.There are lot's of examples of thatLast edited by damian; 08-28-2012, 02:24 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Louis View PostThe Greek name of the city is Thessaloniki. A shorter version in vernacular is Saloniki or in writing Thes/niki.
Salonika is a Jewish version.
I don't know what Soloun is, or when it first appeared. Various sources say it's Old Church Slavonic but recently I had read in THIS forum the original Slavonic text and it called it something else (Selanina or something like that). I can't locate this thread. Can anyone help? Also, can anyone find the first sources using Sol(o)un?
Comment
-
-
Why bother providing evidence since you will deny or rationalise it for your own platform? I will just say IMRO and Okhranists etc had their own policy. What do you think would have happened if Macedonia became "independant" parts of it would have broke off to join Greece or other states and there probably would have been civil war as well. Do you understand what I mean when I say all the theses can be criticized and not just with discourse?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by damian View PostWhy bother providing evidence since you will deny or rationalise it for your own platform? I will just say IMRO and Okhranists etc had their own policy. What do you think would have happened if Macedonia became "independant" parts of it would have broke off to join Greece or other states and there probably would have been civil war as well. Do you understand what I mean when I say all the theses can be criticized and not just with discourse?”A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims... but accomplices”
― George Orwell
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by DraganOfStip View PostYou deceiving Greek bastard,IMRO of Vanco Mihailov was a totally different organization from the original IMRO of 1893,it was a pro-bulgarian organization and Ohrana was a bulgarian paramilitary organization that not only fought against Greeks but also against the Macedonian volunteers in DAG in the Greek civil war because they fought for joining Aegean Macedonia with the Macedonian republic in Yugoslavia.So it was the Bulgarians that did these alleged massacres (that we are yet to see evidence of) of yours,not the Macedonians.The majority of the people in pre-1913 Macedonia were Macedonians,Greeks became majority after the exodus of our people and settlement of the "imported" Greeks from Asia minor.And so Lerin became Florina,Kostur became Kastoria,Voden became Edessa and Solun became Thessaloniki and anything Macedonian was suppressed and erased from Greek schoolbooks.But then again,if you truly was Macedonian,you would have known all this now,would you shpion eden?
You are saying they never took part in the Okhrana? That it was all Bulgarians etc? That they didnt join SNOF en masse as oppurtunists when the war was ending? That they didnt mislead the people? No what I know there are all kinds of people who live in Macedonia. Thats what I know. And if you are looking for origins and purity etc you are like a blind man at best and a propagandist, ideologue to boot at worst. And that you are just as bad as the other side. And I didnt call anyone names no need for that.[/QUOTE]Last edited by damian; 08-28-2012, 05:41 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by damian View PostYou are saying they never took part in the Okhrana? That it was all Bulgarians etc? That they didnt join SNOF en masse as oppurtunists when the war was ending? That they didnt mislead the people? No what I know there are all kinds of people who live in Macedonia. Thats what I know. And if you are looking for origins and purity etc you are like a blind man at best and a propagandist, ideologue to boot at worst. And that you are just as bad as the other side. And I didnt call anyone names no need for that.Last edited by DraganOfStip; 08-28-2012, 06:08 PM.”A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims... but accomplices”
― George Orwell
Comment
-
-
Dragan, spot on. Damian will not be with us much longer. We have little need for duplicitous cockroaches.Risto the Great
MACEDONIA:ANHEDONIA
"Holding my breath for the revolution."
Hey, I wrote a bestseller. Check it out: www.ren-shen.com
Comment
-
Comment