Telma TV: Traitor Zaev met with Albanian Diaspora, promised them Federalization

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • iceman
    Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 132

    Telma TV: Traitor Zaev met with Albanian Diaspora, promised them Federalization

    Telma TV: Zaev met with Albanian Diaspora, promised them Federalization
    Thursday, 21 April 2016

    - We have demands, but we're part of the Diaspora and cannot decide. Everyone knows I want federalization of Macedonia, so I met with Zaev, we agreed, he's got my support, and you see right away Zaev received support from the new Albanian political parties, says Musa Ljamalari head of the Albanian diaspora in London - reports TV Telma.

    Tomorrow's protest is organized by UCK, Soros, small islamist organizations and SDSM. The protest is slated to begin at 14:00 from Bit Bazaar, and will end in front of the Parliament.

  • vicsinad
    Senior Member
    • May 2011
    • 2337

    #2
    And so the call for federalization have begun by thousands of Albanian protestors (mostly UCK sympathizers). A passage from a longer article:

    Several thousand Albanians added their voices to the chorus of dissent with the current authorities in the divided country.


    “We are protesting for a bi-national state and for two official languages [Macedonian and Albanian],” Zijadin Zela, head of the movement for reforms inside the opposition DPA, said.

    As his words indicated, the protest was not only aimed at the government but also against the Macedonian state as it has existed for the past 25 years, which many Albanians consider discriminatory.

    The peaceful protest, which started in the Albanian-dominated municipality of Cair, moved slowly through Skopje and ended in front of the parliament in central Skopje.

    Protesters also drove several vehicles with banners saying “Albania, where are you?” and “Stop the politically driven [court] processes.”

    Comment

    • Redsun
      Member
      • Jul 2013
      • 409

      #3


      Until recently, in the absence of prior agreement on a clear and precise definition, the concept was thought to mean (as a shorthand) 'a division of sovereignty between two levels of government'. New research, however, argues that this cannot be correct, as dividing sovereignty - when this concept is properly understood in its core meaning of the final and absolute source of political authority in a political community - is not possible. The descent of the United States into Civil War in the mid-nineteenth century, over disputes about unallocated competences concerning slavery and ultimately the right of secession, showed this. One or other level of government could be sovereign to decide such matters, but not both simultaneously. Therefore, it is now suggested that federalism is more appropriately conceived as 'a division of the powers flowing from sovereignty between two levels of government'.


      A ridiculous concept, bi-national state. What a joke when the Albanians don't amount to half of their opposition.

      How do you share something with your counterpart when both parts are not of equal size, if you try to share equally it would be absolutely unfair for the greater part.

      Comment

      Working...
      X