Justinian the Great and General Belisarius

[Delodephius]

Slovak: cisár
Czech: cisař
Polish: cesarz
Slovenian: cesar
Serbo-Croatian: car
Bulgarian: цар
Macedonian: цар
Ukrainian: цар
Russian: цар
Belorusian: цар
Old Church Slavonic: кѣсар҄ь, цѣсар҄ь

[Soldier of Macedon]

Slovak: cisár
Czech: cisař
Polish: cesarz
Slovenian: cesar
Serbo-Croatian: car
Bulgarian: цар
Macedonian: цар
Ukrainian: цар
Russian: цар
Belorusian: цар
Old Church Slavonic: кѣсар҄ь, цѣсар҄ь

Slovak, what is your opinion on the name and the person of Belisarius, were they of a group related to the Slavic-speaking people?

[TrueMacedonian]

I have another question as well. Was Belisarius (or Velicar) Dardanian?




Illyrian?




Thracian?

http://www.historynet.com/gothic-war-byzantine-count-belisarius-retakes-rome.htm/2

Coming from a Thracian family, Belisarius had served in the corps of bodyguards of Emperor Justin, Justinian’s uncle and predecessor, before distinguishing himself as a general.


Or Macedonian?








Could it be that Velicar was a Macedonian?

[TrueMacedonian]

Was Justinian Macedonian?




Some say Illyrian. Others Thracian. And some Macedonian. What do you guys think?

[Soldier of Macedon]

Good sources.

Thracian, Illyrian, Macedonian - all cut from the same cloth. The areas where Justinian and Belisarius originate have been considered all of the above on various occasions. I am of the opinion that these two figures were of a people that spoke a language akin to the Slavic tongue along and north of the Danube, from where the Slavic tribes attacked and invaded the East Roman emperor. The 'Dardanian' area spoken of falls within the territory of the Macedonian Republic and ethnic Macedonian regions.

[Soldier of Macedon]

All and none, but most accurately as either Illyrian or/and Macedonian. See:

http://www.macedoniantruth.org/forum/showthread.php?p=13749#post13749

[Po-drum]

Similarly, it is today believe that the Slavonic word for king - kral, korol, kralj, kráľ, etc. derives from the name of Charlemagne - Karl, in English Charles. But I think it could be of a much older origin deriving from something like the root *kar - "to rule", "to smite". There are no words for a ruler or king in any Slavic language that derive from the IE root *h₃reǵ- (Lat. regere, Gk. ὀρέγω (oregō), Eng. riht/right, Gm. reht/recht, ON réttr, Goth. raihts, Thrac. rhesus, Toch. räk/räk, Arm. arcvi/ardzvi;
*H₃rēǵ-(H₃ón-) / "ruler, king": Skr. राजन् (rājan), Oscan regaturei, Lat. rēx, Gaul. rīx, Ir. ríg/rígh, Welsh rhi, Av. raz, Pers. rahst, Alb. radhë), unless borrowed, but I couldn't find anything on *kar, so I won't go any further on that.

Regarding *kar - I can say it only reminds me of the name of first macedonian mitycal king Karan.
Аctually, there is a word "kara" - a verb that is used in a part of macedonian dialects (south and eastern) and in modern bulgarian literary language which have a meaning of "drive, lead, to make, to force to compel".

[Daskalot]

Regarding *kar - I can say it only reminds me of the name of first macedonian mitycal king Karan.
Аctually, there is a word "kara" - a verb that is used in a part of macedonian dialects (south and eastern) and in modern bulgarian literary language which have a meaning of "drive, lead, to make, to force to compel".

welcome to the forum Po-drum, good first post!

[osiris]

oxi re he was a slavophonos glick like the other one the arabophonos glick, they were all glick from the nth to the sth, sorry guys to bring the conversation down to a glick leval.

[Bratot]

I want to point out something

First, do I notice the word SLAV descend of Beliesarius?

Born: 505 AD

When exactly the "Slavs" arrived?

Or they were always present there...


Another thing:

The last victory of Belisarius was gained in repelling an inroad of the Bulgarians, A. D. 559. (Agath.^^. V. 15-20; Theophanes, pp. 198,199.)
In a. D. 563 he was accused of a conspiracy against the life of Justinian, and his fortune was seques*tered. All that is certain after this is, that he died on the 13th of March, A. D. 565. (Theophanes pp. 160, 162.)

http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/0488.html

He also was fighting against the Bulgarians, who were intruders.

[TrueMacedonian]

First, do I notice the word SLAV descend of Beliesarius?

Born: 505 AD

When exactly the "Slavs" arrived?

Or they were always present there...

It's also interesting to note another "Slav" General in Justinians army who also fought against the Bulgars. Chilbudius the Slav-http://books.google.com/books?id=n5pRANRQ-D0C&pg=PA51&lpg=PA51&dq=chilbudius+the+slav+genera l&source=bl&ots=waUCYw8wWh&sig=cL_veSSE9BZjAl4v8QR 7028akL4&hl=en&ei=XJ_KSa6qOeHinQeW6OnHCQ&sa=X&oi=b ook_result&resnum=5&ct=result

Here's what Florin Curta has to say about Chilbudius(or Phoney Chilbudius) http://books.google.com/books?id=mnS...um=1&ct=result

[Bratot]

I guess they didn't payed attention by using the terms "Slav" to point out somebody living before the 6th century.

Contradiction huh!?!

[Pelister]

Precisely.

Why couldn't he be the Byzantine General of Macedonian descent?

This whole "Slav" shit that is creeping its way into our posts is starting to shit me.

[Risto the Great]

Justinians Fortress

http://www.balkanalysis.com/2009/05/26/in-eastern-macedonia-a-lost-fortress-of-justinian/

Great pictures on the link.

By Christopher Deliso
High on a windswept ridge in Macedonia’s barren northeastern expanse, some 17 kilometers down a rough dirt track heading towards Kratovo, it stands as a cryptic reminder of the country’s still largely undocumented past: the rocky remains of what was once an important outpost in the Early Byzantine imperial hinterland.

Nevertheless, the lack of specific references in Late Antique and Byzantine sources means that we may never know what the name of the settlement or its fortress actually was- a tantalizing omission that could only be resolved “by epigraphy finds, which we so far haven’t encountered,” says Dr. Carolyn Snively, an archaeologist and professor from Gettysburg College in Pennsylvania. For the last decade, Dr. Snively has been working jointly with international and Macedonian experts, supported by local workers at Konjuh- in the process, shedding light on this little-documented period of Macedonia’s remote history.

Recently having arrived back in Macedonia, Dr. Snively will soon lead excavations into an eleventh season of work. The dig will last from May 28 through August. Earlier today, she shared some insights and projections for this season’s upcoming work with Balkanalysis.com.

Background and Significance

The Konjuh site was originally discovered in 1938, but only worked on extensively during the 1970s by Yugoslav archaeologist Ivan Mikulcic. This Serbian expert drew the original plan of the site, which has been redrawn several times. Although the plan “seriously needs to be updated,” says Dr. Snively, “we have not had an architect on site with enough free time and surveying skill to do it in recent seasons.”

Although the name of the settlement and fortress has vanished, pottery finds date the ruins, clearly a fortress standing watch over now buried remnants of an urban settlement and church, to the 6th century- and the reign of Emperor Justinian I (r. 517-565), one of the greatest Byzantine rulers. Under Justinian, imperial authority was reasserted as far as northern Africa and parts of Italy. Justinian’s expansion efforts were executed by a powerful military led by his renowned general, Belisarius, considered a master tactician who could win battles even when cut off from communications with the capital or other parts of the army.

Serbian archaeologist Ivan Mikulcic’s original plan of the Konjuh site, with fortifications of the lower city outlined in orange (courtesy Carolyn Snively)

The Kratovo region, part of the mineral-rich Osogovski Mountain range, has always had strategic importance for its mines. Romans, Byzantines and Ottomans all excavated it extensively for gold, silver and iron. In the 6th century, the Byzantine Empire was beset by barbarian tribes in the Balkans but still held on to large areas through an extensive system of fortresses that allowed military garrisons to provide some measure of protection for settlements and ongoing economic activities. Indeed, an important part of the Justinianic legacy was the refortification of the region as part of his general military strategy.

At the fortress site, finds have revealed that one significant local activity then was the excavation of iron ore, a substance which archaeologists have discovered in large quantities among the various artifacts discovered to date.

The mining was carried out near today’s village of Konjuh. A tiny enclave of a few hundred people, without even a village shop, the village is about 500m south of the ridgeline upon which the bygone fortress stands. Here there are no great stone towers or constructions, at least no remaining ones here, but the steepness of the ridge and its width at the top would have provided protection for defenders and adequate space to store weapons, provisions and, when necessary, people.

The fortress ridgeline is surrounded by valleys and, further on, flanked by other small ridges that could also have served as military outposts. At the top, the acropolis, there is a remarkable 3m (15ft)-deep cistern, and the remains of several small stairways and paths chiseled into the sides of the rock. Naturally formed turrets overlook the plain, behind which Byzantine bowmen could have taken aim at any invaders below.

Below, on the northern base of the fortress, excavators have made their most substantial discoveries. A street system, and the base of a Late Antique church indicate organized settlement occurred there over a period of several centuries. The settlement likely dates from the 5th century, says Dr. Snively, adding that “there was probably a 3rd or 4th-century settlement in the vicinity, though I don’t think the inhabitants started living on the sun-exposed northern terrace until the need for building a fortification arose later.”

2009: Upcoming Plans

In keeping with the professional approach to managing the site, the remains of the foundations are all painstakingly reburied each year at the end of the digging season- partly, for their own protection, since the project hasn’t the funds to hire a full-time guard. According to Dr. Snively, the team won’t re-dig everything that has been buried in previous seasons. “This year, we will concentrate on excavating the apse of the basilica we discovered last year,” she says.

This exciting discovery confirms the significance of the site as a former center of civilization with some amount of population. According to Dr. Snively, one of the main goals of the 2009 dig in terms of this structure will be “to define the basilica’s shape and dimensions- we can say with 95 percent certainty that it is a 6th-century basilica, which would have been built within a few decades of Justinian’s fortification works.”

Indeed, the whole region is remarkably rich in sites once populated during the Late Antique period. According to Katie Haas, an archaeology student from Gettysburg College who has come to Macedonia for the summer thanks to a grant from the Mellon Foundation, “there is a marked efflorescence of Late Antique sites in this region.” As a member of the dig team, Katie will concentrate on the important job of small finds analysis- particularly, spatial pattern analysis of the site. She is part of a nine-person team (comprised of American, British and Macedonian archaeologists, who will be aided by local workmen.

Methodology and Cultural Heritage Protection

While locals have since learned to respect the site’s integrity and have developed good relations with the excavation teams, some nefarious diggers have in the past attempted to search here, as almost everywhere in Macedonia, for gold – in the process, breaking their drill heads when inadvertently striking the solid bedrock.

While occasionally outsiders continue to show up illegally, Dr. Snively does not anticipate any trouble this summer from the “wild diggers,” as such people are known in the press. Indeed, other local inhabitants are more in danger, as when the villagers’ sheepdogs were sadly poisoned en masse by a probable sheep-rustler- indicating that this still is the wild east to some extent.

Part of the archaeologists’ sustained good relations with the locals owes to education and trust-building efforts carried out since 1998. But it also owes to something that helps explain why the fortress has attracted relatively little attention thus far- a lack of shiny objects. The lack of major awareness of the site, despite its historical significance, probably stems from the fact that neither gold nor silver, nor colorful mosaics have yet been discovered. Traditionally, these sort of ‘big-ticket’ items are what draw attention from the central government (this is of course not only the case in Macedonia).

Although archaeologists do not anticipate making stunning discoveries of buried treasure at Konjuh, the possibility cannot be completely excluded. Working with extraordinary diligence since 1998, Dr. Snively has deliberately not chosen to dig for burial areas on the site – even though such spots would have the best chance of containing jewelry and coins – partly because there has not been sufficient support available to protect the site during the off-season. Were the site to gain a reputation for riches, the thinking goes, it would become more difficult to protect it from looters.

Another reason why the team is deliberately not looking for burial sites is because of lack of sufficient support for an activity which would greatly enlarge the scope and character of the operation.

“If we found a cemetery, we would then have to bring in a physical anthropologist too,” says Dr. Snively, noting also the further permits and bureaucratic requirements that would be needed in such cases. While the Macedonian government has pledged an all-out campaign for excavating “mega-sites” like Stobi, Heraclea and Ohrid-area locales, more modest sites like Konjuh have gone largely unnoticed.

Konjuh: “A Great Example of Cooperation”

Konjuh locals have also been happy to see the site remain undisturbed, archaeologist Snively believes, because it has provided an occasional source of employment for the economically depressed village, when additional workers or watchmen have been needed over the past decade. “Injecting even a few thousand dollars into the local economy makes a big difference in a small village like this,” she notes.

Future Tourism Potential?

Indeed, one of the very interesting aspects of the site for the future is its specific placement. The fortress is set in what is today literally the middle of nowhere, on a ridge above the Kriva River near Konjuh. However, some raised concrete pillars that might seem equally mysterious to outsiders may hold the key for the area’s development as a tourism destination. Long-neglected skeletons of bridge supports, these and other similar structures dot the wilderness in eastern Macedonia- unfinished pieces of proposed railway and highway links to Bulgaria. For various reasons, the long-hoped-for infrastructure project has never been completed. If it were, the site would be ideally located for travelers to access.

Even today, the Konjuh fortress site is accessible enough for visitors, if coming with a professional guide, and part of a cluster of local sites around Kratovo, such as the standing stone dolls of Kuklica, the enigmatic Neolithic rock site of Cacev Kamen, and the magnificent Lesnovski Monastery. When combined with the natural beauty of this mountainous region and the potential for outdoor activities, plus the architectural attractiveness of Kratovo itself, this clearly indicates the potential for a multi-faceted tourism product that could conceivably put this forgotten corner of northeastern Macedonia back on the map- even if the name of the fortress settlement has vanished from the map long ago.

The cultural heritage protection aspect of the Konjuh fortress site is particularly intriguing to Seth Elder, an American Fulbright scholar from DePauw University in Indiana. Seth chose to come to Macedonia for his research on the practical connections between archaeology, local communities and economic development. Since arriving in Macedonia last year, and touring numerous sites, he has gained insight into the Konjuh site from a comparative sense.

According to him, “the Konjuh site is a great example of cooperation between local and international archaeologists, and also with the local community. Since Macedonia has been somewhat isolated from international archaeologists’ attention, there’s a real need for more work like this to be carried out in the future.” He also emphasizes the need for Macedonian archaeologists to publish their findings more widely in foreign journals, as this activity is a key part of attracting the attention of outside experts who often have the ability to acquire funding and personnel for increasing archeological efforts.

[TrueMacedonian]

Justinian born to Slavic Parents

http://byzantineempire.info/

Born in Illyricum to Slavic parents adopted by his uncle, the emperor Justin (452-527).