Brian's Corner

[Brian]

You may have seen throughout this thread that I prefer 'conspiracies' of the real kind (political/economic) backed by evidence.

Phoenix and EgejskaMakedonia have introduced to this thread 'Aliens' and the like so seeing it's Moomba time - a kind of 'silly season' - I thought I'd show I also have a humerus side and indulge in their silliness and post something I found that's maybe better than their "Ancient Alien" stuff.

Don't go using this against me in the future, remember you introduced 'Aliens', I'm just having fun in indulging in your silliness to mark Moomba and the the threads 'Over 40 Pages' mark.

UFO 2012 - Mayan elders message to Humanity 2012 Don't be afraid
UFO 2012 - Mayan elders message to Humanity 2012 Don't be afraid - YouTube

2012 UFO's are here
2012 UFO's are here - YouTube


But this is more my kind of 'conspiracy' with some logical evidence.

March 22, 2012 Next MEGAQUAKE & Axis Shift? (Short Version) - YouTube

[Brian]

Repeat post deleted.

[Brian]

Secretary Panetta drops a bombshell that the USA can get permission from the UN or NATO to start a war. This prompted representative Walter Jones to start looking into impeachment action against Obama - YEAH!!! Can his ass.

There still is the court case against Obama challenging his eligibility to be President or run for the up-coming election.

More on this possible impeachment from the "New American".

Déjà Vu: Obama's Military Actions in Syria May Be Impeachable

http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/11139-deja-vu-obamas-military-actions-in-syria-may-be-impeachable

09 MARCH 2012
On Wednesday, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Martin Dempsey told the Senate Armed Services Committee that the Obama administration would seek “international permission” before engaging in war in Syria. Besides the possibility that it is merely a ruse — as there is growing evidence that the United States may already be covertly involved in Syria’s war — for the United States to seek permission from other nations to go to war is unconstitutional. For that reason, Representative Walter Jones (R-N.C., left) has just introduced House Concurrent Resolution 107, calling for the impeachment of the President if he declares war without congressional approval.

Jones's resolution, which calls upon the U.S. House — with the Senate concurring — to prevent President Obama from starting yet another war without Congress declaring war. HCR 107 states:

Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.

Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress violates Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.

The Obama administration has openly rejected the constitutional requirement of seeking congressional approval for U.S. military engagement.

"Our goal would be to seek international permission and we would come to the Congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this," Panetta replied. "Whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress, I think those are issues I think we would have to discuss as we decide what to do here."

The Obama administration has previously violated the Constitution in electing to involve the United States in an attack on Libya without congressional consent, prompting some members of the U.S. House to issue a resolution demanding that the President explain his reasons for such a decision. The resolution was ignored.

The Ohio Democrat told Raw Story, “President Obama moved forward [militarily against Libya] without Congress approving. He didn’t have congressional authorization, he has gone against the Constitution, and that’s got to be said.”

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) declared at the time that President Obama’s approval of air strikes against Libya was officially an “impeachable offense.”

Kucinich has been relatively consistent on the issue of unconstitutional wars, as he indicated his desire to impeach President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney for similar actions in leading the United States into war against Iraq.

Ironically, in 2007 Obama adhered to a philosophy similar to that of Kucinich, when as a Senator he declared, “The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”

Since taking office, however, President Obama’s views of the so-called War on Terror seem to have changed dramatically. Yahoo's Associated Content observed:

Barack Obama has been obliged to renege on a number of his campaign promises surrounding the War on Terror. Besides keeping the prison at Guantanamo open, he has not made a precipitous withdrawal from Iraq, has actually increased troop levels in Afghanistan, and has stepped up drone strikes in the Waziristan region of Pakistan. The joke is that Obama has killed more terrorists in the two years of his presidency than George W. Bush did in all eight years of his.

In fact, critics note that President Obama has exhibited all the qualities worthy of a neoconservative’s praise. Former Vice President Dick Cheney has hailed many of Obama’s hawkish decisions, explaining, "I think he's learned that what we did was far more appropriate than he ever gave us credit for while he was a candidate. So I think he's learned from experience.”

The discussion of a possible Obama impeachment was revisited following the targeted killing of American-born al-Qaeda leader Anwar al-Awlaki last September, with no charges being brought. Texas Congressman and GOP presidential contender Ron Paul has observed that because of the President’s “flouting” of the law in the murder of al-Awlaki, impeachment is possible.

Ben Johnson of White House Watch wrote of the assassination of al-Awlaki:

Although federal agents have sought al-Awlaki since the Clinton administration, and the Authorization for the Use of Force passed following 9/11 allows the president to kill anyone he “determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11,” al-Awlaki’s birth in the United States has many debating the proper interplay between national security and civil liberties.

According to Rep. Paul, the assassination of an American citizen, regardless of the reason, "continues" and "accelerates" the "slip toward tyranny.” He added, "I put responsibility on the president because this is obviously a step in the wrong direction. We have just totally disrespected the Constitution.”

Paul warned attendees at a town hall meeting in Manchester, New Hampshire, that permitting targeted killings of American citizens without proper due process could set a dangerous precedent:

Al-Awlaki was born here. He is an American citizen. He has never been tried or charged for any crimes. If the American people accept this blindly and casually that we now have an accepted practice of the president assassinating who he thinks are bad guys I think it’s sad. What would the people have said about Timothy McVeigh? We didn’t assassinate him. We were pretty certain that he had done it. And they put him through the courts and they executed him.

Similarly, blogontherun.com wrote, “When the president of the United States can singlehandedly order the assassination of a U.S. citizen without charge or trial, we’re not just on the slippery slope toward dictatorship, we’re in free fall.”

Paul added that virtually every U.S. President during his own terms in Congress had committed impeachable offenses. “I just said almost every President I’ve known I’d probably have to vote for impeachment, because there’s very little respect for the Constitution, and certainly there’s no respect for the Constitution [if they’re] assassinating American citizens.”

Ironically, Panetta callled upon the Constitution in his defene of the President’s decision to seek international approval for military intervention in Syria. "When it comes to the national defense of this country, the President of the United States has the authority under the Constitution to act to defend this country and we will,” he declared.

He did not explain how U.S. military intervention in the Mideast country of Syria is acting in defense of the United States or where in the constitution authorization for such executive branch action is found.

[Brian]

If Obama keeps going the way he has the USA is F'ed.

When Obama got elected a record number of guns were sold. In 2011 a doubling of gun sales and now it's only March and gun sales have surged a further 60% creating upto a 6 week backlog.

LOL. Any time I need a laugh I just think of Oprah back in the day when Obama was first running for Office and hoe the 'Black Super Man' was going to save us all and fix everything.LMFAO.

[Brian]

Secretary Panetta drops a bombshell that the USA can get permission from the UN or NATO to start a war. This prompted representative Walter Jones to start looking into impeachment action against Obama - YEAH!!! Can his ass.

There still is the court case against Obama challenging his eligibility to be President or run for the up-coming election.

TRAITOR LEON PANETTA ADMITS U.S. SOVEREIGNTY BEING SURRENDERED BY OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

http://www.myfreedompost.com/2012/03/traitor-leon-panetta-admits-us.html

VIDEO

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=5zNwOeyuG84

Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta Commits Treason, Violates Oath

Traitor Leon Panetta, Obama's Secretary of Defense, tells Senator Jeff Sessions (R-LA) that Obama's goal would be to seek "international permission" to establish a "legal basis" before taking military action, rather than seeking congressional approval (which he inferred to as being an option they "would have to discuss"). This is a obliteration of U.S. sovereignty, Article I Section 8, and Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution.

Leon Panetta, in his sworn testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing today, said:

Senator Jeff Sessions: “Well, I’m almost breathless about that, because what I heard you say is, “We’re going to seek international approval, and you will come and tell the Congress what we might do, and we might seek congressional approval. … You’ve served in the Congress. Wouldn’t you agree that that would be pretty breathtaking to the average American? So would you like to clarify that?”

Leon Panetta: “I’ve also served with Republican presidents and Democratic presidents who have always reserved the right to defend this country if necessary.”

Sessions: “But before we do this, you would seek permission from international authorities?”

Panetta: “If we’re working with an international coalition and we’re working with NATO, we would want to be able to get appropriate permissions in order to be able to do that. That’s something that all of these countries would want to have, some kind of legal basis on which to act.”

Sessions: “What legal basis are you looking for? What entity?”
Panetta: “Obviously, if NATO made the decision to go in, that would be one. If we developed an international coalition beyond NATO, then obviously some kind of U.N. security resolution would be the basis for that.”

Sessions: “So a coalition of, so you’re saying NATO would give you a legal basis and an ad hoc coalition of nations would provide a legal basis?”

Panetta: “If we were able to put together a coalition and were able to move together, then obviously, we would seek whatever legal basis we would need to in order to make that justified. I mean, we just can’t pull them all together in a combat operation without getting the legal basis in which to act.”

Sessions: “Who are you asking for the legal basis from?”
Panetta: “If it’s, obviously if the U.N. passed a security resolution as it did in Libya, we would do that. If NATO came together as it did in Bosnia, we would rely on that. So, we have options here if we want to build the kind of international approach to dealing with the situation.”
Sessions: “Well I’m all for having international support, but I’m really baffled by the idea that somehow an international assembly provides a legal basis for the United States military to be deployed in combat. I don’t believe it’s close to being correct. They provide no legal authority. The only legal authority that’s required to deploy the United States military is the Congress and the president and the law and the Constitution.”

Panetta: “Let me just for the record be clear again, Senator, so there’s no misunderstanding. When it comes to the national defense of this country, the president of the United States has the authority under the Constitution to act to defend this country, and we will. If it comes to an operation where we’re trying to build a coalition of nations to work together to go in and operate as we did in Libya or Bosnia or for that matter Afghanistan, we’d want to do it with permissions either by NATO or by the international community.”

Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution, clearly states that only Congress can declare war. Neither the president, the defense secretary, nor anybody else is authorized to make that decision. Article 6 of the Constitution states that the Constitution is the "Supreme law of the land". No foreign entity or law supercedes the Constitution, yet Panetta voluntarily admits this administration's complete disregard for the Constitution and surrender of U.S. sovereignty, even after Senator Sessions gave him multiple opportunities to restate, clarify, or backtrack his position. He did not change his position, but instead doubled down, proving that this wasn't just some accidental "slip of the tongue".


Instead, Panetta made it clear that he has prefers to make foreign approval and acceptance superior to our own law. If the U.S. Government has made our laws subordinate to some foreign authority, then we have given up our sovereignty, all without a shot being fired by a foreign enemy. Our enemy is within. Abraham Lincoln had it right (I wonder how he knew this!) when he prophetically warned:
"America will never be destroyed from outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves."

Please be reminded that Leon Panetta, the Secretary of Defense, was appointed by Obama and serves at his pleasure. He is speaking for the Obama administration, representing the Department of Defense, "the principal assistant to the President in all matters relating to the Department of Defense." He is part of the President's cabinet. He is speaking for the Obama administration and representing the President's policy when he speaks. President Obama must be pressured to take ownership and defend Panetta's statement, making him as guilty as Panetta is, or he should denounce Panetta's remarks and fire him. Unfortunately, no one in government or the press will do so. Most haven't even read the Constitution, nor do the care about the rule of law or even U.S. sovereignty for that matter.

Leon Panetta has publicly, under sworn testimony, made known that his allegiance is not to the U.S. Constitution, which he took an oath to uphold, but to some foreign or international body, like NATO or the United Nations. Panetta has violated his constitutional oath and should be removed from office and punished for this treasonous act.

[Brian]

Next time your having a hear-attack it could be Phoenix working for these guys.

It's a cool looking gun anyway.

Just to show some 'conspiracy theorists' do get killed (where was Phoenix on the night of 01 March?).

Sudden Death of Andrew Breitbart Sparks Rumours...


Senators Frank Church and John Tower examine a CIA poison dart gun that causes cancer and heart attacks.

CIA Whistleblower talks about Heart Attack gun - YouTube


If it's Fatso that's after you it could be this.

The Heart Attack Grill - YouTube

[Brian]

'War on Terror is War on Liberty' - Nigel Farage launches e-petition

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=FDnpqEuiieo

[Brian]

Just to show some of the grubby child and women trafficing USA companies (DynCorp) are involved with in the millions of people. F'ed thing is DynCorp Dep of Child Services in the USA and I think UK.

Dyncorp exposed for the trafficking of Women and Children - YouTube

[Brian]

The '9/11' smoking gun.
Notice 'Tower 7' still standing in the background over the female reporter's shoulder even though moments before the studio anchor said it had fallen down - YEAH, OOPS! How did he know beforehand 'Tower 7' would fall??? If this tower was staged then it means they must have all been, get it?

If This Does Not Get Thru To You; Nothing Will!!!
If This Does Not Get Thru To You; Nothing Will!!! - YouTube

[Brian]

For ALL those still believing Phoenix (a proven liar) that Eugenics means anything else than wanting to KILL YOU AND YOUR LOVED ONES or that nuclear energy is safe and developed for a power source only watch this and then make up your own mind.

New World Order: Blueprint of Madmen 2/3 - YouTube

New World Order: Blueprint of Madmen 3/3 - YouTube

If you need to, pause the videos when newspaper articles are shown and look them up yourself to prove it to yourselves.

Or you can do what Phoenix says and just talk about football and the like, just do it in the football thread.

[Brian]

UK Watch your pensions guys.
There knocking down pensions in the USA and now in the UK.

Half a million savers' retirement plans shattered as payouts from 'crippled' with-profits pensions plunge

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/pensions/article-2107814/With-profits-pensions-Retirement-plans-shattered-plunging-payouts.html#ixzz1nxQyII6i

29th February 2012
Hundreds of thousands of savers have had their retirement hopes dashed by the banking crisis and a crash in payouts on with-profits pensions.

Those reaching pension age now are getting £4,975 less a year than an identical saver who retired five years ago, Money Mail research has revealed.

Rest of article in Link.

[George S.]

maybe because he had the dirt on them that andrew got the flick.

[Brian]

Just to show some 'conspiracy theorists' do get killed (where was Phoenix on the night of 01 March?).

Sudden Death of Andrew Breitbart Sparks Rumors...

http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/20483/61/

02 March 2012
Noting that the cause of Andrew Breitbart’s unexpected death yesterday was being examined by the Los Angeles County Coroner’s office, talk-radio host Michael Savage raised the question of whether the conservative media powerhouse – who recently announced he had videos that could politically damage President Obama – was murdered.

On his top-rated show today, Savage played an audio clip of Breitbart telling an audience at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington last month that he had obtained videos that shed light on Obama’s ties to radicals in the early 1980s who helped propel him to the presidency.

“Maybe my overly active imagination kicked into overdrive,” Savage told his listeners of his decision to raise the question. “But you heard what Breitbart said – he has videos … we’re going to vet the president.”

Breitbart reportedly was walking near his home in Brentwood, Calif., just after midnight this morning when he collapsed. A neighbor saw him fall and called 911. Emergency crews tried to revive him and rushed him to the emergency room at the UCLA Medical Center.

It’s entirely plausible, Savage acknowledged, that Breitbart simply collapsed of a heart attack because of overwork and a reported history of health problems.

“I’m asking a crazy question,” Savage said, “but so what? We the people want an answer. This was not an ordinary man. If I don’t ask this question, I would be remiss.”

Breitbart told the CPAC crowd last month that the videos would reveal Obama during a time when he was meeting a “bunch of silver ponytails” – referring to Weather Underground terror group members Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

Ayers and Dohrn reportedly launched Obama’s political career with a fundraiser in their Chicago home.

Savage noted that Breitbart had dinner with Ayers and Dorhn three weeks ago at the couple’s Hyde Park residence on Chicago’s South Side, which is near Obama’s home. Breitbart was invited by Daily Caller Editor-in-Chief Tucker Carlson, who won an Internet auction for a dinner party with the couple.

“I’ve got videos – this election we’re going to vet him,” Breitbart said at CPAC, promising they would show how “racial division and class warfare are central” to the “hope and change” that Obama”sold in 2008.”

“He threatened the president at CPAC with video that could derail the president’s campaign,” Savage said.

“I pray it was natural causes, but we’ll never know the truth.”

Savage said that if Breitbart’s colleagues have the videos, they should post them as soon as possible and make them viral “or they’ll never see the light of day.”

Savage said he hadn’t spoken with Breitbart for the past two years, but he recalled the media mogul’s visited to his home in the Bay Area.

“He spoke for three straight hours,” Savage said. “I was unable to say a word.”

Savage also attended a party at Breitbart’s Los Angeles home.

“I told him two years ago to get a body guard. Never be alone in the street,” Savage said.

Savage, the author of the bestselling novel “Abuse of Power,” put on his novelist hat and speculated about ways a murderer could remain undetected by inducing a heart attack that didn’t leave any traces.

A caller from Savage’s native New York City said there’s a simple way to find out what happened.

“If the tapes come out, he died of a heart attack,” the caller said. “If the tapes don’t come out, they whacked him.”

[makedonche]

@ Mods
Please delete the chemtrails, NWO conspiracies, Vampire Royals, Skynets, Crystallized Honey, GMO's, UFO's, DFO's, RDO's, XXO's and Dumbo's...keep it red pill dudes...

Phoenix
This is Brians corner, not Phoenix's, I don't think it's fair you start removing stuff from here!

[makedonche]

Welcome to my nightmare...

Phoenix
Jesus it's dark in here....in this nightmare!