Originally posted by makedonin
View Post
I understand your caution, but I find it not right when you reject in advance and ridicule something you, actualy, don't know. In my opinion, d-r Popovski is a serious and thorough author and he is far from the "employed linguistic" you mention. Wfhat I suggest is sane (not malicious) scepticism, which means: let us wait and see how the work will be evaluated by the international scientific public. In the mean time you can use (for fun)
Leave a comment: