Forced Migration and Mortality in the Ottoman Empire

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Onur
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 2389

    Forced Migration and Mortality in the Ottoman Empire

    Forced Migration and Mortality in the Ottoman Empire

    From 1790 to 1923 more than 7 million persons were forced from their homes in the Balkans, the Caucasus and Anatolia. At the same time, another six million were counted among the dead, and many more dead were never counted. It was one of the worst human disasters in history, but is little known today. When the suffering of the time has been described, all too often only dispossessed and dead Christians have been considered. Yet the greatest mortality and exile were experienced by Muslim peoples—Turks, Circassians, Kurds, and others. All shared in the suffering in that terrible time.


    The West
    In 1790 the Ottoman Empire in Europe contained the lands south of the Danube River, Bosnia and most of Romania. Much of that land was to be lost through Great Power intervention, mainly by defeating the Ottomans in war. Russia forced the independence of Serbia, Romania and Bulgaria. The Great Powers in concert forced the creation of an independent Greece. The Austrians seized Bosnia. By 1912, the new Balkan countries were strong enough to defeat the Ottomans themselves. Only a small wedge of Europe, Eastern Thrace, remained to the Empire.


    Greece
    The small Muslim population was largely expelled from Serbia in the early 1800s, but the effective beginning of the Turkish exodus from Southeastern Europe came in Greece. After the Greek Rebellion of 1822 to 1830 all of the Turks of the new Greek Kingdom were gone; all had either migrated or died. When Greece expanded to the north in 1880, 70,000 more Turks left the occupied territories for the Ottoman Empire. By the time Greece formally annexed Crete in 1913, all but a few of the Cretan Turks had been expelled.


    The War of 1877-78
    The 1877 Russian invasion of Ottoman Europe led to the flight of 515,000 and the deaths of 288,000 Bulgarian Muslims, nearly all Turks. Only 46% of the Bulgarian Muslims remained. In exchange, 187,000 Bulgarians from what remained in Ottoman Europe went to Bulgaria.

    By percentage, the worst losses in the period took place among the Muslims in regions taken by Montenegro, Serbia and Romania. In the lands taken by Montenegro all of the Muslims were gone, in the lands taken by Serbia, 91% (119,000) were gone, in the lands taken by Romania 83% (152,000) were gone. Bosnian Muslims fled during a Serbian revolt in 1875 and after a failed Muslim revolt against Austrian occupation of Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1881-2.


    The Balkan Wars
    At the onset of the Balkan Wars, the Muslim population of Ottoman Europe was slightly over 50%—Turks in the East, Albanians in the West. Population numbers, however, were not a concern to Serbia, Montenegro, Greece, and Bulgaria. Each coveted the parts of Ottoman Europe that they viewed as their ancestral homelands. e problem was that each desired the same property. they joined together to defeat the Ottomans in the first Balkan War, then fought among themselves for the spoils. Serbia, Montenegro, Greece, and Romania attacked Bulgaria. The Ottomans also attacked Bulgaria to reclaim some land in Europe.

    Of the Christian peoples, it was the Bulgarians who lost most: 100,000 Bulgarians fled to Bulgaria from Ottoman Thrace and from the lands conquered by the other Balkan countries. It was the Muslims, however, who most suffered. 27% of the Turks of Ottoman Europe died and 18% were surviving refugees. No one counted the numbers lost in the great slaughter and dispossession of Albanians in the West.


    Turkish War of Independence
    An unknown number of Greeks, perhaps 100,000, went from Western Anatolia to Greece before World War I began, affected by anti-Greek economic pressure after the Balkan Wars. Aided especially by the British, the Greek Army invaded Western Anatolia in 1919. They immediately began attacks on Turkish villages and cities, ultimately forcing 1.2 million Turks from their homes in Western Anatolia and an unknown number from Thrace (what had remained of Ottoman Europe after the Balkan Wars). The Turkish Nationalists, led by Mustafa Kemal, defeated the Greeks by 1922. It was then the turn of the Greeks to take flight. A post-war agreement exchanged the Greeks of Turkey (excepting Istanbul) for the Turks of Greece (excepting Eastern Thrace). 850,000 Greeks were exchanged for 480,000 Turks. 530,000 Turks and 310,000 Greeks had died.


    The East
    The Russian Empire expanded to the south. When it annexed the Crimea in 1779 approximately 100,000 Crimean Tatars (Turks who had lived there for centuries) fled the Crimea and surrounding areas for the Ottoman Empire. Immediately after the Crimean War, they were joined by a further 300,000 Crimean Tatars and an unknown number of Nogay Tatars. Their place was taken by Christian subjects of the Tsar.

    In the East, Russian conquest was to lead to a great exchange of Muslim and Christian populations with much suffering that was to continue until 1920. In 1800, the area that is today’s Armenia, Central Georgia and Azerbaijan was a loosely governed part of the Persian Empire. The Ottoman Empire controlled a small area to the North of today’s Turkish border. The Russians took the region in a series of annexations and conquests from 1801 to 1829. A large number of Azeri Turks fled to Iranian Azerbaijan in 1806-7. 20,000 Turks fled the Erivan Province (today’s Armenian Republic) in 1827-9. Their place was taken by Armenians from Iran and the Ottoman Empire, drawn by the availability of land taken from the exiled Turkish farmers and Russian promises of freedom from taxes.


    Circassians and Abhazians
    The Russians continued and expanded their policy of forcing Muslims out of conquered lands. 1.2 million Circassians and Abhazians, Muslim inhabitants of the Eastern Black Sea region, were expelled to the Ottoman Empire in the 1860s. One-third of them subsequently died, mainly of starvation and disease. During and immediately after the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-78, 78,000 Turks left conquered lands in Northeastern Anatolia, their places taken by 20,000 Armenians from the Ottoman East.


    World War I
    Armenian rebels had begun to take action against Ottoman troops and officials and Muslim civilians before the Ottomans entered World War I. In the first months of the war, civilian populations moved to cities and other safe places. During the war, Armenian units attached to the Russian Army and guerrilla units of Ottoman Armenians spearheaded the Russian invasion of Anatolia. e way in which the war was fought maximized civilian suffering. In 1914 and 1915 the Russians and Armenians invaded Eastern Anatolia. The invasion was accompanied by wholesale slaughter of Turks and Kurds. When the Russians were briefly defeated and forced to retreat, 300,000 Armenians fled to Russia and an unknown number to Iran. Until the Russian Revolution freed the survivors, the Russians allowed few of the Armenians to return to their homes. Great numbers, perhaps half, of the Armenian refugees starved or died of disease. By 1916, the Russians had returned, forcing the flight of more Turks and Kurds. From 1915 to 1916 more than a million Muslims had been forced westwards. Like the Armenians, they starved or were killed by disease. 62% of the Muslims of Van Province, for example, died.

    The Ottoman Government responded to the perceived threat from its Armenian population by relocating 440,000 Armenians to Syria and, to a lesser extent, to Iraq.

    At war’s end, Armenians took control of Erzurum Province, but the Ottoman Army defeated them. Armenians escaped to the Northeast, killing Turks and destroying villages. In addition, by 1920, 220,000 Turks had fled the Armenian Republic for Turkey. The French took Cilicia (South-central Anatolia, the Adana region) after the Armistice. Armenians, especially those who had been relocated to Syria, moved into the region and attacked the Turks there. Many Turks fled the Armenians and the French. Others began a successful military campaign that drove out the French. e Armenians followed the French retreat. In all, 30,000 Armenians and an unknown number of Turks were refugees.



    The Toll
    The death toll in these wars and dislocations was tremendous. The dead on all sides were mainly civilians, and many more died from disease and starvation than were directly killed by their enemies. But consideration should be given to the calamity that struck even those refugees who survived. It was a life of hunger in refugee camps or begging on the streets—homes and farms gone forever. Many made new lives, but saw them ruined again. A Turkish farmer who was forced out of Bulgaria at age 20 in 1878 might have fled to Ottoman Europe, where he survived, perhaps even prospered. Again forced out in 1912, he might have lived as a penniless settler near Izmir. In his old age, disaster struck again as he was forced to flee from Izmir in 1919. Most likely he would have left dead family and friends behind in each place, killed by the invaders who drove him from his home. Much the same story could have been told of Greeks or Armenians.



    An Annotated Map
    The size of the arrows on the main map indicates the relative size of the migrations. Placement of the arrows was in some places dictated by the necessity of placing many arrows in a small space, and thus is not geographically perfect. For example, the arrow for the exile of Turks from Armenia in 1918-20 should have pointed further south, were it not necessary to also include an arrow for the Armenian exiles to Armenia. Even approximations of many of the forced migrations are unknown. Rough estimates are reflected in the size of arrows.

    “Anatolian Wars” in the small map of wartime mortality shows the percentage deaths of Muslims, Greeks, and Armenians. Muslim percentages are for the war zones in Eastern and Western Anatolia. Wartime migration, however, makes it impossible to give Armenian and Greek deaths only in the war zones. Those figures are for Anatolia as a whole, but they roughly correspond to the percentages for Muslims.

    The map does not include many migrants that left their homelands looking for work, were attracted by offers of free land and relief from taxes, or simply did not wish to live under their home governments’ rule. These would have included the Armenians whom the Russians attracted to their Caucasus conquests after 1829 to take the place of expelled Turks and the Greeks and Armenians who went to America seeking a better life. It would have included the Turks who continued to leave the Balkans and Russia up until the end of the twentieth century. It also would have included the great number of all groups who moved in peace time across ever-changing borders to escape persecution or simply to live with their fellows. Had these been included, the map would have been a mass of small arrows.




    Justin McCarthy
    American demographer, professor of history at the University of Louisville




    Last edited by Onur; 03-24-2012, 05:06 AM.
  • DirtyCodingHabitz
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 835

    #2
    I've seen thousands of these. But did I just see 520,000 Turks migrate to Manastir? I don't see any Macedonians in this map?...

    1770-1923 must have been depressing years for everyone .

    Comment

    • Risto the Great
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2008
      • 15658

      #3
      I wonder why the academic drew the line at year 1923?
      Within a few short years thereafter we would have seen hundreds of thousands of Christian Turkish nationals deposited into Greek occupied Macedonia.
      Risto the Great
      MACEDONIA:ANHEDONIA
      "Holding my breath for the revolution."

      Hey, I wrote a bestseller. Check it out: www.ren-shen.com

      Comment

      • Onur
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2010
        • 2389

        #4
        Originally posted by DirtyCodingHabitz View Post
        I've seen thousands of these. But did I just see 520,000 Turks migrate to Manastir? I don't see any Macedonians in this map?...
        520.000 Turks gone from Bulgaria to Manastir when Ottoman Empire lost Bulgaria to the Russians in 1878. Not all of them stayed there tough. Some gone to Aegean Macedonia, just to be expelled from there again in Balkan wars in 1912. Some already gone to Anatolia in 1878.

        So, actually, there was Turkish people living in Bosnia, Romania, Serbia, up to the Hungary too but they were gradually forced to leave to Macedonia first then to Anatolia laters. Also same for Bosnians. When Austria-Hungary empire took Bosnia, some of them gone to Macedonia. Those were grandfathers of your current Bosnian minority. Ofc some part of them came to Thrace, Anatolia in Balkan wars again.

        Ofc worst part of it all; All these immigrants of 1878...1912 came to Aegean Anatolia and when Greece invaded it in 1919, 1.2 million of them expelled to central Anatolia by Greek army and they were able to return to Aegean side again after 3 years, in 1922. As the article says, 530.000 Turks and 310.000 Greeks died in that 3 years of time because of Greek Megali Idea expansionism and you know, there was population exchange of 1,5 million people afterwards!!!

        In the end, there was about 13 million people in Turkey at 1928. Maybe 4-5 million of them was locals, 8 million of them was these immigrants of 1878-1923.


        Most of these names on the map are not ethnicity. It`s just religious affiliation, patriarchs or exarchists according to Ottoman era censuses. So, there are Macedonians between them but it`s generally unknown how many people have been migrated or died for certain for pre-WW1 era.
        Last edited by Onur; 01-11-2011, 08:41 PM.

        Comment

        • Agamoi Thytai
          Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 198

          #5
          Originally posted by Onur View Post
          Ofc worst part of it all; All these immigrants of 1878...1912 came to Aegean Anatolia and when Greece invaded it in 1919, 1.2 million of them expelled to central Anatolia by Greek army and they were able to return to Aegean side again after 3 years, in 1922. As the article says, 530.000 Turks and 310.000 Greeks died in that 3 years of time because of Greek Megali Idea expansionism and you know, there was population exchange of 1,5 million people afterwards!!!
          So it was only the fault of Greek policy??Your Young Turk butchers were the ones that started the ethnic cleansing in Asia Minor during World War 1,before the Greek invasion.Have you ever heard of the infamous Amele Taburu,the Turkish forced labor battalions for Greeks and Armenians of Asia Minor and how many thousands of them died?First you should have aknowledged your own crimes and then blame others:

          It was some time before the story of the Armenian atrocities reached the American Embassy in all its horrible details. In January and February fragmentary reports began to filter in, but the tendency was at first to regard them as mere manifestations of the disorders that had prevailed in the Armenian provinces for many years. When the reports came from Urumia, both Enver and Talaat dismissed them as wild exaggerations.


          On 26 August 1914 the world-famous university library in the Belgian town of Louvain was looted and destroyed by German troops. The international community reacted in horror - 'Holocaust at Louvain' proclaimed the Daily Mail - and the behaviour of the Germans at Louvain came to be seen as the beginning of a different style of war, without the rules that had governed military conflict up to that point - a more total war, in which enemy civilians and their entire culture were now 'legitimate' targets. Yet the destruction at Louvain was simply one symbolic moment in a wider wave of cultural destruction and mass killing that swept Europe in the era of the First World War. Using a wide range of examples and eye-witness accounts from across Europe at this time, award-winning historian Alan Kramer paints a picture of an entire continent plunging into a chilling new world of mass mobilization, total warfare, and the celebration of nationalist or ethnic violence - often directed expressly at the enemy's civilian population.




          Before Rwanda and Bosnia, and before the Holocaust, the first genocide of the twentieth century happened in Turkish Armenia in 1915, when approximately one million people were killed. This volume is an account of the American response to this atrocity. The first part sets up the framework for understanding the genocide: Sir Martin Gilbert, Vahakn Dadrian and Jay Winter provide an analytical setting for nine scholarly essays examining how Americans learned of this catastrophe and how they tried to help its victims. Knowledge and compassion, though, were not enough to stop the killings. A terrible precedent was born in 1915, one which has come to haunt the United States and other Western countries throughout the twentieth century and beyond. To read the essays in this volume is chastening: the dilemmas Americans faced when confronting evil on an unprecedented scale are not very different from the dilemmas we face today.

          For thirty years Ben Kiernan has been deeply involved in the study of genocide and crimes against humanity. He has played a key role in unearthing confidential documentation of the atrocities committed by the Khmer Rouge. His writings have transformed our understanding not only of twentieth-century Cambodia but also of the historical phenomenon of genocide. This new book—the first global history of genocide and extermination from ancient times—is among his most important achievements. Kiernan examines outbreaks of mass violence from the classical era to the present, focusing on worldwide colonial exterminations and twentieth-century case studies including the Armenian genocide, the Nazi Holocaust, Stalin’s mass murders, and the Cambodian and Rwandan genocides. He identifies connections, patterns, and features that in nearly every case gave early warning of the catastrophe to come: racism or religious prejudice, territorial expansionism, and cults of antiquity and agrarianism. The ideologies that have motivated perpetrators of mass killings in the past persist in our new century, says Kiernan. He urges that we heed the rich historical evidence with its telltale signs for predicting and preventing future genocides.
          "What high honour do the Macedonians deserve, who throughout nearly their whole lives are ceaselessly engaged in a struggle with the barbarians for the safety of the Greeks?"
          Polybius, Histories, 9.35

          Comment

          • Serdarot
            Member
            • Feb 2010
            • 605

            #6
            Originally posted by Onur View Post
            ...
            Most of these names on the map are not ethnicity. It`s just religious affiliation, patriarchs or exarchists according to Ottoman era censuses. So, there are Macedonians between them but it`s generally unknown how many people have been migrated or died for certain for pre-WW1 era.
            thats why you get our respect, and those idiots from the south (and also east, north and west) will never get our respect.

            you are fair enough to write it, that between those millions of expelled people, not all war turks, or the "turks" were actualy Muslims from many ethnicities, just as not each "greek" or "bulgar" or "serv" was greek or bulgar or serb.

            unfortunately, our southern, eastern, western and northern neighbors are so srewed in their fascist brains, that they claim realy stupid claims.

            for example, today is "srpska nova godina", "serbian new year"...

            i´ve met several calenders from the ancient to present time, with the prefix "Macedonian", but not SINGLE calender, with prefix "serbian".

            they claim each orthodox chirst in bosnia, croatia adn etc is a serb.
            the "greeks" claim each christian is a greek
            the bulgarians claiming almost the same

            now the albanians, in their national madness, claim we are all occupators, they are the real natives, also they are the real Macedonians...

            i mean... this is thread about forced migrations. it is showing how many millions of people migrated.
            Bratot:
            Никој не е вечен, а каузава не е нова само е адаптирана на новите услови и ќе се пренесува и понатаму.

            Comment

            Working...
            X