Originally posted by Po-drum
View Post
In cyrillic alphabet we have "ф", but it's not originally slavic sound. Sign for "ф" is introduced for expression of greek words
.

But both this sounds (ф, џ) are functionaly present in macedonian language and throughout dialects so I don't see problem of expressing them.
You have strange criterias of what necessery is. First of all you have to understand that standard language is "necessary evil" as someones are saying.
My apologetic attitude is not directed towards serbian influence as such, but more for the peoples who had been in situation to implement it. In that context I'm trying to unerstand not only victims of serbian but also those of bulgarian and greek influence (Prlichev, Miladinovci, Zinzifov). They are part of our history, and if we don't agree with their views and works that doesn't meen it didn't happened.
How many people were using that "proper" alphabet in Macedonia (with je, tita, , psi,..)? They were understanding church slavonic in the same extent they understood greek liturgies.
It is unneccesery to write complicated forms when you have more simplistic and useful variants.
I think ours is everything we posses together with our negative attributes. From the aspect of linguistic you think ours are just the slavic texts that have been written in IX and X centuries.
But how do you know they (Cyrillic and glagolitic alphabets) were not elitistic one (those who don't care about preservation of originality)??
Why do you perceive our language history from the position of XIX century panslavistic view of what is ours and what is not?
Are you against the concept of Misirkov for construction of standard language on the basis of selection of one dialect who would be enough distant from bulgarian, serbian, greek and albanian influenced periferial dialects?
Leave a comment: