this is only excerpt of the article, so don't get the wrong impresion that the only people in Macedonia are Greeks. And in the excerpt he already mentioned that:"no one knows who is who and everybody is someone else".. I must say nothing has changed on the Balkans.
ofcourse there are no Greek agents mentioned because the Guy wan't to clean the Greeks, he is Phillhellene. In the rest of the article he praises the Greeks at high level.
by the way, the Greek agents were the Makedonomachos and Greek Patriarchists, and just cause the Phillhellene of the article avoids to mention them, does not means that they did not exist and didn't did their work.
But of course you will play the dumb card, since it fits you
Well...i m not sure you can have a logical conclusion that supports your opinion..
A British guy says there were Bulgarian,Romanian and Serbian agents in Macedonia...
So...does this mean he concludes there were ethnic Macedonians too?
Well...i m not sure you can have a logical conclusion that supports your opinion..
A British guy says there were Bulgarian,Romanian and Serbian agents in Macedonia...
So...does this mean he concludes there were ethnic Macedonians too?
The logical conclusion that support my view is that the Propagandists i.e. Bulgarians, Romanians, Serbs and Greeks were fighting for Macedonian and the Macedonian Population with all their means standing in their disposal so that they spread confusion among the Population so that the Author says:
"no one knows who is who and everybody is someone else"
Fishing in muddy waters, that's how it was.
The Macedonian Intelegentsia knew this, so they were trying to fight their way to the peasantry to help preventing the Identity.
This how ever was almost impossible, since all the Propagandists were State sponsored, and were activly fighting the Macedonian Inteligentsia.
To enquire after the impression behind an idea is the way to remove disputes concerning nature and reality.
And through these muddy waters...emerged the Macedonian national identity.
Making connections with Samuil or Alexander the Great do not make the modern Macedonian nation more glorious.
(to catch some of u up with that...for me making connections of modern with ancient Greece is similar -although slightly different situations)s
And through these muddy waters...emerged the Macedonian national identity.
Making connections with Samuil or Alexander the Great do not make the modern Macedonian nation more glorious.
like the Identity of the so called Romaoi who now claim 2400 year continuity and that everything is theirs
just that this Romaoi had tha luck to have their sponsors i.e. Germans and Britains who had thein interests in creating the Greek Kingdom, but rather than Romania Secunda....
by the way, do you know who the ROMA are... what is your relation ship with them.
Roma, Romaoi, sorry but I am not able to see the difference.
1.like the Identity of the so called Romaoi who now claim 2400 year continuity and that everything is theirs
just that this Romaoi had tha luck to have their sponsors i.e. Germans and Britains who had thein interests in creating the Greek Kingdom, but rather than Romania Secunda....
2.by the way, do you know who the ROMA are... what is your relation ship with them.
Roma, Romaoi, sorry but I am not able to see the difference.
1.If you were not blinded in the middle of my post u would see i told it first.
The slight difference i wrote is primarily the language.
1.in the middle of my post u would see i told it first.
2.Racist garbage.
1. editing posts after reading my reply and than playing that you were the first to come on the idea is not that cool too. but you are right, both comparations are identical, no one of us will get glory by trying such childish identifications.
2. It is no race question at all, but rather linguistic. I asked about your relation to them cause you shared the same name.
Roma and Romaoi, Romanian, Arumn comes from the word ROM and refers to the East Roman Empire, later under Ottoman Rumelia.
Why all this different people chose such similar identification?
And for the human race of the ROMA, ROMAOI or the pople living in ROMANIA, I don't give a damnt, they can be what ever they are,
1. editing posts after reading my reply and than playing that you were the first to come on the idea is not that cool too. but you are right, both comparations are identical, no one of us will get glory by trying such childish identifications.
Anyway..we have more serious matters to disagree for..
..Like the sarissas under the modern Macedonian flag,in your avatar
modern Macedonian flag
ah wait, I recall, the Ancient Macedonian flag was the Star on white blue stripes with a cross in the left corner, yeah right, or was it more like swastika than cross ?
by the way, I hoped you could help me with the Romaoi, Roma, Romanian aRumn understanding, the linguistic aspect of it ofcourse
ah wait, I recall, the Ancient Macedonian flag was the Star on white blue stripes with a cross in the left corner, yeah right, or was it more like swastika than cross ?
Yes the ancient flag first used before 20 years (or was it 15?)
Yes the ancient flag first used before 20 years (or was it 15?)
yep you are right before it was Star on white blue stripes with swastika in the left corner. should we adopt it again just for the sake of historical accuracy??? what do you suggest?
To enquire after the impression behind an idea is the way to remove disputes concerning nature and reality.
yep you are right before it was Star on white blue stripes with swastika in the left corner. should we adopt it again just for the sake of historical accuracy??? what do you suggest?
Before it was a decorative stylized pattern ,used in thousands of ancient Greek art artifacts,including a gold larnax dug out in Vergina,Emathia district.
Thats all.
Comment