I may be joining this thread a little late, but an observation I have made over the years of my involvement in Diaspora organizations and Forums is that, when it comes to a document such as the Macedonian Cause, the goals of most Macedonians are well known, understood, accepted and are supported by all or most Macedonians, the key issues that lead to debate is the course undertaken to achieve these goals.
Some people support a more militant, radical approach to achieving recognition and rights for Macedonians, while others support a diplomatic, less abrasive path, as well as any path in between.
My question for this thread is, should we include sections detailing proper approaches to the achievement of goals outlined in the Cause, or should we leave some ambiguity to allow for multiple approaches and diversity in the culmination of our goals?
Some people support a more militant, radical approach to achieving recognition and rights for Macedonians, while others support a diplomatic, less abrasive path, as well as any path in between.
My question for this thread is, should we include sections detailing proper approaches to the achievement of goals outlined in the Cause, or should we leave some ambiguity to allow for multiple approaches and diversity in the culmination of our goals?
Comment