The Photoshopper did a great job it is hard to see any evidence but really how is that banner standing up?
Exposing Bulgarian Myths and Lies
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Niko777 View PostThe first time I saw the photo was with the sign. The other appeared years after on some Macedonian facebook group. The sign fits into the ideology of the Bulgarian occupation at the time. They were trying to make Macedonians think they are liberators who will unite Macedonia. They did the same thing in Lerin. Unification would later be followed by annexation, hence the slogan "One nation, one king, one kingdom". Not sure why this is so hard for people today to understand.
Tell your friends on facebook that by censoring/photoshoping images they are only giving more strength to our enemies and damaging the Macedonian cause, not the other way around.Originally posted by Niko777 View PostOne more thing. Whoever removed the sign from the photo AND said this photo was taken in Skopje was lying. Here is a higher resolution photo. The building on the right is the church Sveta Sofiya in Sofia, Bulgaria.
Perfect! That's exactly what I was looking for Niko - some context and some informed background information. Case closed on this Bulgarian propaganda piece of crap!!!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Niko777 View Postying. Here is a higher resolution photo. The building on the right is the church Sveta Sofiya in Sofia, Bulgaria.
Originally posted by Liberator of Makedonija View PostThe other signs look like they are written in Latin though? The one is question is written in Cyrllic.
Great investigating lads...... thumbs up to you both.http://www.macedoniantruth.org/forum/showthread.php?p=120873#post120873
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vicsinad View PostGood work, Niko.
The sign is being held up by a small thin pole, as is the case with the sign in the left of the photo.
It's not uncommon to have signs in different languages and different scripts at protests, rallies and demonstrations.I know of two tragic histories in the world- that of Ireland, and that of Macedonia. Both of them have been deprived and tormented.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Liberator of Makedonija View PostIt does seem a little uncommon in 1940s Balkans to be honest.
I'm assuming the Latin sign on the right in written in Italian and you can even see apart of the Italian flag during WWII (see below), and the sign on the left is written in German. Bulgaria allied itself with these countries during the war. The soldiers in the photo are probably German and Italian.
Comment
-
-
Can anyone shed light on this? I believe I can confirm that a standard literary form of Bulgarian was not established until 1899 but can't find any information on these supposed other writing systems that were used in place up until then.
I know of two tragic histories in the world- that of Ireland, and that of Macedonia. Both of them have been deprived and tormented.
Comment
-
-
Does it matter? Greek was only finally codified in 1977.Risto the Great
MACEDONIA:ANHEDONIA
"Holding my breath for the revolution."
Hey, I wrote a bestseller. Check it out: www.ren-shen.com
Comment
-
-
You're wondering why they had a few goes at it?Risto the Great
MACEDONIA:ANHEDONIA
"Holding my breath for the revolution."
Hey, I wrote a bestseller. Check it out: www.ren-shen.com
Comment
-
-
Article on the history of the Bulgarian label and how modern Bulgaria has twisted its historical meaning:
The Bulgarian label is one that has been applied to the Macedonian nation both in the past and in the present so to treat the Macedonian question as a part of a larger Bulgarian issue and to assert a Bulgarian national identity upon the Macedonian people. The purpose of this essay is to investigate the purposeI know of two tragic histories in the world- that of Ireland, and that of Macedonia. Both of them have been deprived and tormented.
Comment
-
-
Okay back to this picture:
And looking at:
It's pretty obvious that the location of the photo is in Sophia, Bulgaria, or more precisely here:
Is it possible for someone with a background in digital image forensics to do some analysis on:
to see whether the sign is cropped, the above image is the one wikipedia uses.
For example as an amature, I ran an ELA program and got this:
Now given that the banner with united macedonia is a flat surface, we have the fact: "Regardless of the actual color of the surface, all flat surfaces should have about the same coloring under ELA" (Source: Fotoforenics). This is obviously not the case with that sign in question.
Also we need to update this wikipedia articles that make incorrect reference to the image:
Comment
-
Comment