Not just assimmilation it's forced Assimilation where you don't have choice in the matter.The macedonian people were forbidden to speak or identify as macedonian. & other matters.
1916 Grk Magazine article upset that soldiers in grk army speak Albanian
Collapse
X
-
"Ido not want an uprising of people that would leave me at the first failure, I want revolution with citizens able to bear all the temptations to a prolonged struggle, what, because of the fierce political conditions, will be our guide or cattle to the slaughterhouse"
GOTSE DELCEV
-
-
Originally posted by Daskalot View PostVoltron, you seem a bit confused on your use on the word "assimilation".
If an Arvanite is assimilated into the Greek ethnos, can you explain the connection he now has with Pericles from Ancient times?Risto the Great
MACEDONIA:ANHEDONIA
"Holding my breath for the revolution."
Hey, I wrote a bestseller. Check it out: www.ren-shen.com
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Voltron View PostTo claim we dont exist or are a fabrication of westerners is utterly ridiculous. I dont take it seriously and hope you will grow out of it sometime soon.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Daskalot View PostVoltron, you seem a bit confused on your use on the word "assimilation".
If an Arvanite is assimilated into the Greek ethnos, can you explain the connection he now has with Pericles from Ancient times?
The New Greek has assumed a sham heritge. Its historical claim to territory in the region, including Macedonian territory, is not legitimate. Its not valid. Neither is its legal claim a valid one.Last edited by Pelister; 02-09-2011, 09:50 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pelister View PostThis isn't about 'blood' or DNA, its about the New Greeks (people such as yourself) assuming a sham heritage and 'claiming' territory on the basis that your the true representatives of the ancient Greeks, when in fact you are not. It is ofcourse also about the New Greeks assuming regions were once 'Greek', in order that they might have a claim in the first place, but that is just a facile and weak attempt to conquer new territory. The New Greeks have never been able to accept people the way they found them. As a state its institutions, its government could never reflect the actual state of things on the ground. If you accepted people the way they were and actually allowed a free choice - there is no way you would hold one part of Macedonian territory right now. The ONLY way the invading 'Greeks' got it was by force, and the only way they held it was by force. That makes your 'title' legally defective. What you fail to properly acknowledge is just how historically defective it is too. The point I made about the way the New Greeks throw around loose categories of identity such as 'Hellenic' and 'Greek' is to write yourselves into new territory, where Greeks never existed. You by passed that point. It didn't seem to register with you.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Daskalot View PostVoltron, you seem a bit confused on your use on the word "assimilation".
If an Arvanite is assimilated into the Greek ethnos, can you explain the connection he now has with Pericles from Ancient times?
•the state of being assimilated; people of different backgrounds come to see themselves as part of a larger national family
•the social process of absorbing one cultural group into harmony with another
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwnLast edited by Voltron; 02-10-2011, 06:32 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Voltron View PostLet me guess. We are a fabricated ethnos but you on the other hand are direct descendents from ancient Macedonians. Correct ?
You are correct.
The only thing it is a vice-versa statement made by just about every Modern Greek.
Such modern Greeks include the ones from Asia Minor, Vlachs, Arvanti who have settled in Macedonia not long ago and claim to be pure whereas our great-great-great^n grandfathers are new settlers who don't have the right to declare themselves and their offsprings as Macedonians
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by makgerman View PostYou are correct.
The only thing it is a vice-versa statement made by just about every Modern Greek.
Such modern Greeks include the ones from Asia Minor, Vlachs, Arvanti who have settled in Macedonia not long ago and claim to be pure whereas our great-great-great^n grandfathers are new settlers who don't have the right to declare themselves and their offsprings as Macedonians
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by makgerman View PostJust as serious as you are Vol.
Go on your fellow Modern Greek forums and claim that we have every right to call ourselves Macedonians. What sort of response do you think you'll receive?
Do you think they left Macedonia unharmed ? Be realistic.
Comment
-
-
Modern Greeks are not the descendents of the ancient Greeks” and here is why! Those who today call themselves “Greeks” did not exist as “Greeks” before the Greek state was artificially created by the Philhellenes in the early 1800’s. In fact it is more accurate to call these people “Albanians’, “Vlachs”, “Latins”, “Turks”, “Macedonians” and so on than to call them “Greeks, descendents of the ancient Greeks”.
Unlike the Macedonians who were a nation before they had a country, there was no “Greek nation” before there was a Greek state. In other words, the Greek nation was artificially constructed to fit the country that was created for it by the Philhellenes. The people that made up the so-called “Greek nation” were assimilated Albanians, Vlachs, Turks, Macedonians and others who happened to live in that region. Therefore it is more accurate to say that the “Modern Greeks” are the descendents of the 19th century Albanians, Vlachs, Turks and 20th century Macedonians than it is to say that they are the descendents of the ancient Greeks from 2,600 years ago!The Macedonians originates it, the Bulgarians imitate it and the Greeks exploit it!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by The LION will ROAR View PostModern Greeks are not the descendents of the ancient Greeks” and here is why! Those who today call themselves “Greeks” did not exist as “Greeks” before the Greek state was artificially created by the Philhellenes in the early 1800’s. In fact it is more accurate to call these people “Albanians’, “Vlachs”, “Latins”, “Turks”, “Macedonians” and so on than to call them “Greeks, descendents of the ancient Greeks”.
Unlike the Macedonians who were a nation before they had a country, there was no “Greek nation” before there was a Greek state. In other words, the Greek nation was artificially constructed to fit the country that was created for it by the Philhellenes. The people that made up the so-called “Greek nation” were assimilated Albanians, Vlachs, Turks, Macedonians and others who happened to live in that region. Therefore it is more accurate to say that the “Modern Greeks” are the descendents of the 19th century Albanians, Vlachs, Turks and 20th century Macedonians than it is to say that they are the descendents of the ancient Greeks from 2,600 years ago!
Comment
-
-
Back on to the original topic on hand:
page 352
Venizelos is a great statesman. His largely Albanian government, with the largely Albanian Army and Navy, and his dumping of Baptised Turks and other non-grk ethnicities in Macedonia in order to "ethnically make Macedonia Greek" in his words, are works of art like Micheangelo or Da Vinci. I applaud his efforts Another source that entertains the sad reality of hellenism. Albanian spoken in the grk army. Wow. But should we all be surprised?
Comment
-
Comment