I shall present some of my research about any possible relationship between Albanian language and any Caucasian language! The Udi language is considered by most of linguists as the last remnant of a language once spoken in Caucasian Albania.
Linguists have never thought about any relation between Albanian and Udi. They classified it to be of a totally different stock from Albanian of Balkans:
If we want to establish ties between two language, we have to start from basic vocabularies of both languages. Let begin with the numerical system:
In Udi:
Albanian
1. Njė
2. Dy
3. Tre
4. Katėr
5. Pesė
6. Gjashtė
7.Shtatė
8. Tetė
9. Nėntė
10. Dhjetė
In contrast, in Albanian numbers from 11 to 19 aren't formed by adding such suffixes.
The hundreds in Albanian are based on 'qind'/ 'hundred'
Linguists have never thought about any relation between Albanian and Udi. They classified it to be of a totally different stock from Albanian of Balkans:
Genetic affiliation
Udi belongs to the Southern (or Lezgian)group of the East Caucasian language family. It can be regarded as a marginal Lezgian language stemming from a Proto-Lezgian dialect that became separated from the central ‘Samur’ branch quite early (1500 BC ?). It can be assumed that the Proto-Lezgian ‘urheimat’ was located in Northern Azerbaijan (roughly speaking in the region between the Kura and Alazani rivers). Archi, another marginal language, was the first dialect to leave this continuum, lateron followed by what then became the Samur languages (Eastern Samur: Lezgi proper, Tabasaran, and Aghul), Western Samur (Rutul, Tskahur), Southern Samur (now in the Shah-Dagh mountains) (Kryts and Budukh). The speakers of Early Udi obviously stayed in the southern and eastern parts of the Proto-Lezgian urheimat. The so-called ‘tenth’ Lezgian language, namely Khinalug (in the Shah-Dagh mountains) probably emerged from contact of a Proto-Lezgian dialect with another yet unidentified East Caucasian language (or vice versa). Udi shares some important isoglosses with the Western Samur language Tsakhur. There are no significant isoglosses with languages outside the Lezgian branch of East Caucasian (Nakh, Awaro-Andian, Tsezian, Lak, or Dargwa).
http://www.lrz.de/~wschulze/udinhalt.htm
Udi belongs to the Southern (or Lezgian)group of the East Caucasian language family. It can be regarded as a marginal Lezgian language stemming from a Proto-Lezgian dialect that became separated from the central ‘Samur’ branch quite early (1500 BC ?). It can be assumed that the Proto-Lezgian ‘urheimat’ was located in Northern Azerbaijan (roughly speaking in the region between the Kura and Alazani rivers). Archi, another marginal language, was the first dialect to leave this continuum, lateron followed by what then became the Samur languages (Eastern Samur: Lezgi proper, Tabasaran, and Aghul), Western Samur (Rutul, Tskahur), Southern Samur (now in the Shah-Dagh mountains) (Kryts and Budukh). The speakers of Early Udi obviously stayed in the southern and eastern parts of the Proto-Lezgian urheimat. The so-called ‘tenth’ Lezgian language, namely Khinalug (in the Shah-Dagh mountains) probably emerged from contact of a Proto-Lezgian dialect with another yet unidentified East Caucasian language (or vice versa). Udi shares some important isoglosses with the Western Samur language Tsakhur. There are no significant isoglosses with languages outside the Lezgian branch of East Caucasian (Nakh, Awaro-Andian, Tsezian, Lak, or Dargwa).
http://www.lrz.de/~wschulze/udinhalt.htm
In Udi:
The basic ordinals (1-10) are as follows:
1 sa
2 p’a?
3 xib - xe.b - xe.?b
4 bip’
5 qo
6 u?q
7 vu?g/ - vug/
8 mu?g/ - mug/
9 vui
10 vic’
http://www.lrz.de/~wschulze/morph5.htm#numer
1 sa
2 p’a?
3 xib - xe.b - xe.?b
4 bip’
5 qo
6 u?q
7 vu?g/ - vug/
8 mu?g/ - mug/
9 vui
10 vic’
http://www.lrz.de/~wschulze/morph5.htm#numer
1. Njė
2. Dy
3. Tre
4. Katėr
5. Pesė
6. Gjashtė
7.Shtatė
8. Tetė
9. Nėntė
10. Dhjetė
Numbers from 11 to 19 are formed by adding -(e)c’c’e to the first decade which is derived from vic’ ‘ten’ (an opaque element -e is added). The numerals of the first decade may experience slight (in parts idiosyncratic) modifications (especially in allegro speech):
11 sac’c’e
12 p’a?c’c’e
13 xibe’c’ce
14 bip’ec’c’e
15 qoc’c’e
16 u?qec’c’e
17 vu?g/ec’c’e
18 mu ?g/ec’c’e
19 vuic’c’e - vuiec’c’e
http://www.lrz.de/~wschulze/morph5.htm#numer
11 sac’c’e
12 p’a?c’c’e
13 xibe’c’ce
14 bip’ec’c’e
15 qoc’c’e
16 u?qec’c’e
17 vu?g/ec’c’e
18 mu ?g/ec’c’e
19 vuic’c’e - vuiec’c’e
http://www.lrz.de/~wschulze/morph5.htm#numer
The hundreds are based on bac/ ‘hundert’:
100 (sa)bac/
200 p’a?bac/
300 xibbac/
400 bip’bac/ - bip’p’ac/
500 uqbac/
600 qo?bac/
700 vu?g/bac/
800 mu ?g/bac/
900 vuibac/
1000 hazar
100 (sa)bac/
200 p’a?bac/
300 xibbac/
400 bip’bac/ - bip’p’ac/
500 uqbac/
600 qo?bac/
700 vu?g/bac/
800 mu ?g/bac/
900 vuibac/
1000 hazar
Comment