The Theory of Evolution

[spitfire]

That's exactly how YOU explained origin of life - carbon and lightening. And going by evolutionary theory, there would have had to be semi-formed organs for billions of years give the supposed minute changes from one generation to the next.

Maybe you're just a really bad representative of naturalism, but I think naturalism is just a ridiculous idea.

Oh yeah, tell us about how the singularity supposedly came out...I've never read anyone try to explain that before (it seems to be just taken on faith) but now you claim there is a story behind it

Nope. That's not exactly, not even close to being exact. I said that it was the enviromental conditions, which means there's a whole lot more.
You don't even know what that is so there is no point talking to you.

I find it boring to quote myself time and again for every imposter that thinks he can distort what I have said.

Actually I find Vangelovski's approach similar to the Quran. It is translated to reading out loud, and it is targeted in repeating it as a prayer with a purpose to believe it in the end.
Going Pavlovian again aren't we?

[Nikolaj]

Tom,

The reason why I stopped posting was because Phoenix suddenly went full retard with his failure to understand what I meant earlier. I think his failure was a result of arrogance when it comes to the reality of ‘evolution’ where he automatically thinks his fighting a creationist. Spitfire, well that’s self-explanatory. It was only then when I realised it was too late to rationalise with these people when it’s quite clear they don’t have the slightest clue of what I meant. It is one of the most important principles in science; a principle I learnt from one of my professors only a couple of years ago because it was I who had to do physical application of certain sciences. It is clearly unfathomable to them. Phoenix thinks I’m attacking science (something I’ve dedicated my whole life to), and Spitfire not understanding a God damn thing. I call lack of knowledge in science as a whole, maybe with a little more experience and time it’ll sink.

Please refrain from any further discussion Tom; these people don’t know how scientific discussion works. They preach about God in scientific discussion more than a priest during a gospel. They defend science strictly against a God, not scientific rationale and principles. I wouldn’t bother with a final post or any responses to their future comments either as it'll just get more stupid responses of how much they misunderstood everything.

Focus on the history.

Spitfire, please keep posting in this thread, it’ll be nice not having a degenerate posting in all the other threads.

[George S.]

There is a lot of avoidance of the serious questions
when it comes to evolution much devolution.Mans ecplanation with no creator.

[spitfire]

Tom,

The reason why I stopped posting was because Phoenix suddenly went full retard with his failure to understand what I meant earlier. I think his failure was a result of arrogance when it comes to the reality of ‘evolution’ where he automatically thinks his fighting a creationist. Spitfire, well that’s self-explanatory. It was only then when I realised it was too late to rationalise with these people when it’s quite clear they don’t have the slightest clue of what I meant. It is one of the most important principles in science; a principle I learnt from one of my professors only a couple of years ago because it was I who had to do physical application of certain sciences. It is clearly unfathomable to them. Phoenix thinks I’m attacking science (something I’ve dedicated my whole life to), and Spitfire not understanding a God damn thing. I call lack of knowledge in science as a whole, maybe with a little more experience and time it’ll sink.

Please refrain from any further discussion Tom; these people don’t know how scientific discussion works. They preach about God in scientific discussion more than a priest during a gospel. They defend science strictly against a God, not scientific rationale and principles. I wouldn’t bother with a final post or any responses to their future comments either as it'll just get more stupid responses of how much they misunderstood everything.

Focus on the history.

Spitfire, please keep posting in this thread, it’ll be nice not having a degenerate posting in all the other threads.

Now we are teaching like priests. Therefore we are not doing it right.

Excellent way to put it Nikolaj. Thank you for addressing Vangelovski on this.

Oh, one more thing. Goddidit, duh!

[George S.]

Not posting is giving the evolution dide more ammunition.Why give up?
They assume there is no god therefore no creatio .Man is a perfect example rhat god created we havent evolved from monkeys.Man is the pinnacle of gods creation.MAn is destined to wear the god status
in gids kingdom.God is recreating himself in.man.Man needs to be rebotn of the spirit to become god.

[George S.]

Not posting is giving the evolution dide more ammunition.Why give up?
They assume there is no god therefore no creatio .Man is a perfect example rhat god created we havent evolved from monkeys.Man is the pinnacle of gods creation.MAn is destined to wear the god status
in gids kingdom.God is recreating himself in.man.Man needs to be rebotn of the spirit to become god.

[julie]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_correlation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_perception

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance#Belief_disconfirmation_paradigm

[Phoenix]

Tom,

The reason why I stopped posting was because Phoenix suddenly went full retard with his failure to understand what I meant earlier. I think his failure was a result of arrogance when it comes to the reality of ‘evolution’ where he automatically thinks his fighting a creationist. Spitfire, well that’s self-explanatory. It was only then when I realised it was too late to rationalise with these people when it’s quite clear they don’t have the slightest clue of what I meant. It is one of the most important principles in science; a principle I learnt from one of my professors only a couple of years ago because it was I who had to do physical application of certain sciences. It is clearly unfathomable to them. Phoenix thinks I’m attacking science (something I’ve dedicated my whole life to), and Spitfire not understanding a God damn thing. I call lack of knowledge in science as a whole, maybe with a little more experience and time it’ll sink.

Please refrain from any further discussion Tom; these people don’t know how scientific discussion works. They preach about God in scientific discussion more than a priest during a gospel. They defend science strictly against a God, not scientific rationale and principles. I wouldn’t bother with a final post or any responses to their future comments either as it'll just get more stupid responses of how much they misunderstood everything.

Focus on the history.

Spitfire, please keep posting in this thread, it’ll be nice not having a degenerate posting in all the other threads.

That's a bit harsh Nikolaj...

Please remind me...what is the "reality of evolution"...sounds like you have all the answers, I must have missed something during my "full (fool?) retard" moment...

[Risto the Great]

Does it take 48 pages to get to a "reality"?
I must have missed it.
Apparently bringing up Hitler in a thread kills the thread.

Hitler anyone?

[Risto the Great]

http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/dec/22/monkey-saves-dying-friend-train-station-india-video

I reckon this monkey is probably smarter than some humans.

[Carlin]

Richard Dawkins: Show Me the Intermediate Fossils! - Nebraska Vignettes #1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DP53WAkQ5Yc

Richard Dawkins: Why are there still Chimpanzees? - Nebraska Vignettes #2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh0F4FBLJRE

7 Proofs of Evolution in the Human Body

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiAAdI3vnxM