Misirkov disagrees.
And since you finally codified your language in 1976 ... we are streets ahead.

You said:
[QUOTE]Daskalot no offence but yr over yr head here mate...Romeika isn't a language.[/QUOTE]
Then did a cut and paste job saying it was a language until the 20th century.
If you are going to remain stupid, I will have to delete you. Because we are looking for intelligent debate. Is that ok with you?

Yes, right about now an apology would be required for spewing up his 100th lie of the day. Read what you quote next time TB, here you are saying [I]"Romeika isn't a language"[/I] and then you post an article which says [I]"Vernacular Greek continued to be known as "Romaic" up until the 20th century"[/I] -- Before that, it was also known as Romeika, vernacular and oral, don't push some fairytale that can see no light at the end of the tunnel. Danial of Moschopolis in his four-language dictionary in the late18th/early 19th century called the language Romeika - TB, stop manipulating and lying, soon we will grow tired of telling you to do act in line with your namesake and you will disappear back into maggotsphere in cyberspace.

So are you still going to show me the "ethnic Greek" evidence of Heraclius? Or have we now jumped to the next water leaf and pretending that earlier dialogue didn't take place? If the language was changed to Greek because everybody was a Greek, then why not the name of the empire and the people also? Why do they continually refer to themselves as ROMANS? Why are you behaving like a deluded bird-brain that feels the need to go in circles when you cannot provide any decent answer?

In his DAI Constantine Pyrphyrogentius speaks of some Greeks (Graikoi) in the Peloponnese who are neighbours of the Slavic peoples in the same region, but he, of the Macedonian Dynasty, called himself a ROMAN, not a Greek. Greek was the langage of education and the official tongue of East Rome at this time, that is why he employed the language.

When you say conducted himself in a 'Greek manner', what does this mean apart from the typical vague garbage that you have been dumping on these boards all day long?

[QUOTE=Risto the Great;1162]Misirkov disagrees.
And since you finally codified your language in 1976 ... we are streets ahead.

You said:

Then did a cut and paste job saying it was a language until the 20th century.
If you are going to remain stupid, I will have to delete you. Because we are looking for intelligent debate. Is that ok with you?[/QUOTE]

What are you talking about RTG??We had 2 languages the Katharevousa and the Demotic.The Demotic language eventually won out.

[QUOTE=Truth Bearer;1156]Something like yr language before 1944........You opnly spoke it orally never in a written format.[/QUOTE]
Wrong. As usual.


Risto, if this person is manipulating and changing his own posts to suit the flavour of his commentry of the moment, do what you have to do. So far he has done nothing but filled the place up with his lies, half-truths and manipulated information that is conjured up by the Neohellenic moron brigade at maggotsontheweb.

Right.
Apparently you cannot read.

[QUOTE=Truth Bearer;1165]What are you talking about RTG??We had 2 languages the Katharevousa and the Demotic.The Demotic language eventually won out.[/QUOTE]
Yes, it won out, about 30 years ago, and you have had independence for almost near 200 years. On the ball you Greeks are, judging by your posts here you must be Greek.

You see it seems both of you are quick to jump the gun.Read carefully what I wrote

[QUOTE]That is incorrect Daskalot there is no such [B]written language [/B]called "Romeika"......[/QUOTE]

I quoted exactly what you said at post #66 in this thread.
Here it is:
[QUOTE]Daskalot no offence but yr over yr head here mate...Romeika isn't a language.
[/QUOTE]Feel free to edit it to suit your requirements now.

Go to post no# 60 RTG that's when I referred it as written....

Oh, should I disregard some of your posts or all of them?